Paper detail

Homometry and direct-sum decompositions of lattice-convex sets

Two sets in $\mathbb{R}^d$ are called homometric if they have the same covariogram, where the covariogram of a finite subset $K$ of $\mathbb{R}^d$ is the function associating to each $u \in \mathbb{R}^d$ the cardinality of $K \cap (K+u)$. Understanding the structure of homometric sets is important for a number of areas of mathematics and applications. If two sets are homometric but do not coincide up to translations and point reflections, we call them nontrivially homometric. We study nontrivially homometric pairs of lattice-convex sets, where a set $K$ is called lattice-convex with respect to a lattice $\mathbb{M} \subseteq \mathbb{R}^d$ if $K$ is the intersection of $\mathbb{M}$ and a convex subset of $\mathbb{R}^d$. This line of research was initiated in 2005 by Daurat, Gérard and Nivat and, independently, by Gardner, Gronchi and Zong. All pairs of nontrivially homometric lattice-convex sets that have been known so far can essentially be written as direct sums $S \oplus T$ and $S \oplus (-T)$, where $T$ is lattice-convex, the underlying lattice~$\mathbb{M}$ is the direct sum of $T$ and some sublattice $\mathbb{L}$, and $S$ is a subset of $\mathbb{L}$. We study pairs of nontrivially homometric lattice-convex sets assuming this particular form and establish a necessary and a sufficient condition for the lattice-convexity of $S \oplus T$. This allows us to explicitly describe all nontrivially homometric pairs in dimension two, under the above assumption, and to construct examples of nontrivially homometric pairs of lattice-convex sets for each $d \ge 3$.

preprint2016arXivOpen access

Signal facts

What is known right now

Open access2 authors2 topics

Next steps

Decide what to do with this paper

Use like or dislike for the fast social read. The more specific scholarly feedback stays available below when needed.

Log in to curate

Reading frame

Keep the important context close to the paper

Keep the important signals around this paper in one place: votes, save state, collection context, reviews and the metadata you need before deciding what to do next.

Institutions

Add specific reaction

Move through the context

Research map

Open full explorer

Move through nearby people, institutions, topics and adjacent work without leaving the paper page.

Building this map preview

BZPEER is loading the nearby papers, people, topics and institutions for this page.

Structured reviews

0 review(s)

ContributeLeave structured feedbackUse the review template when you have a concrete strength, concern or method question.Open review form

No structured reviews yet. High-signal critique starts here.

Work discussion

0 comment(s)

DiscussAdd a high-signal commentKeep quick notes, caveats and replication pointers separate from formal reviews.Open comment form

No discussion yet. The first strong comment sets the tone.