Homogenization for non-local elliptic operators in both perforated and non-perforated domains

preprint2018arXivOpen access

Abstract

In this paper, we focus on the homogenization process of the non-local elliptic boundary value problem $$\mathcal{L}_\varepsilon^s u_\varepsilon =(-\nabla\cdot (A_\varepsilon(x)\nabla))^{s}u_\varepsilon=f \mbox{ in } \mathcal O, $$ with 0<s<10<s<1, considering non-homogeneous Dirichlet type condition outside of the bounded domain O⊆Rn\mathcal O\subseteq \mathbb{R}^n. We find the homogenized problem by using the HH-convergence method, as ε→0\varepsilon\to 0, under standard uniform ellipticity, boundedness and symmetry assumptions on coefficients Aε(x)A_\varepsilon(x), with the homogenized coefficients as the standard HH-limit (cf. \cite{MT1}) of the sequence {Aε}ε>0\{A_\varepsilon\}_{\varepsilon>0}. We also prove that the commonly referred to as \textit{the strange term} in the literature (see \cite[Chapter 4]{MT}) does not appear in the homogenized problem associated with the fractional Laplace operator (−Δ)s(-Δ)^s in a perforated domain. Both of these results have been obtained in the class of general microstructures. Consequently, we could certify that the homogenization process, as ε→0\varepsilon\to 0, is stable under s→1−s\to 1^{-} in the non-perforated domains, but not necessarily in the case of perforated domains.

Explore this paper’s authors, topics and related work.

Building this map preview

BZPEER is loading the nearby papers, people, topics and institutions for this page.

Reviews 0

Write a reviewWrite

No reviews yet.

Discussion 0

Add a commentWrite

No comments yet.