Paper detail

Homogenization for non-local elliptic operators in both perforated and non-perforated domains

In this paper, we focus on the homogenization process of the non-local elliptic boundary value problem $$\mathcal{L}_\varepsilon^s u_\varepsilon =(-\nabla\cdot (A_\varepsilon(x)\nabla))^{s}u_\varepsilon=f \mbox{ in } \mathcal O, $$ with $0<s<1$, considering non-homogeneous Dirichlet type condition outside of the bounded domain $\mathcal O\subseteq \mathbb{R}^n$. We find the homogenized problem by using the $H$-convergence method, as $\varepsilon\to 0$, under standard uniform ellipticity, boundedness and symmetry assumptions on coefficients $A_\varepsilon(x)$, with the homogenized coefficients as the standard $H$-limit (cf. \cite{MT1}) of the sequence $\{A_\varepsilon\}_{\varepsilon>0}$. We also prove that the commonly referred to as \textit{the strange term} in the literature (see \cite[Chapter 4]{MT}) does not appear in the homogenized problem associated with the fractional Laplace operator $(-Δ)^s$ in a perforated domain. Both of these results have been obtained in the class of general microstructures. Consequently, we could certify that the homogenization process, as $\varepsilon\to 0$, is stable under $s\to 1^{-}$ in the non-perforated domains, but not necessarily in the case of perforated domains.

preprint2018arXivOpen access
0citations
0reviews
0saves
Nocode
Nodataset
0institutions

Next steps

Decide what to do with this paper

Use like or dislike for the fast social read. The more specific scholarly feedback stays available below when needed.

Log in to curate

Reading frame

Keep the important context close to the paper

Keep the important signals around this paper in one place: votes, save state, collection context, reviews and the metadata you need before deciding what to do next.

Institutions

Add specific reaction

Move through the context

Research map

Open full explorer

Move through nearby people, institutions, topics and adjacent work without leaving the paper page.

Building this graph slice

BZPEER is loading the nearby papers, people, topics and institutions for this page.

Structured reviews

0 review(s)

ContributeLeave structured feedbackUse the review template when you have a concrete strength, concern or method question.Open review form

No structured reviews yet. High-signal critique starts here.

Work discussion

0 comment(s)

DiscussAdd a high-signal commentKeep quick notes, caveats and replication pointers separate from formal reviews.Open comment form

No discussion yet. The first strong comment sets the tone.