Paper detail

Homogeneous studies of transiting extrasolar planets. III. Additional planets and stellar models

I derive the physical properties of 30 transiting extrasolar planetary systems using a homogeneous analysis of published data. The light curves are modelled with the JKTEBOP code, with attention paid to limb darkening and eccentricity. The light from some systems is contaminated by faint nearby stars, which if ignored will systematically bias the results. I show that this must be accounted for using external measurements of the amount of contaminating light. A contamination of 5% is enough to make the measurement of a planetary radius 2% too low. The physical properties of the 30 transiting systems are obtained by interpolating in stellar model predictions to find the best match to their measured quantities. The error budgets are used to compile a list of systems which would benefit from additional observations. The systematic errors arising from the inclusion of stellar models are assessed by using five different theoretical models. This model dependence sets a lower limit on the accuracy of measurements of the system properties, and at worst is 1% for the stellar mass. The correlations of planetary surface gravity and mass with orbital period have significance levels of only 3.1 sigma and 2.3 sigma. The division of planets into two classes based on Safronov number is increasingly blurred. Most of the objects studied here would benefit from more photometry and/or spectroscopy, as well as a better understanding of low-mass stars.

preprint2010arXivOpen access

Signal facts

What is known right now

Open access1 author2 topics

Next steps

Decide what to do with this paper

Use like or dislike for the fast social read. The more specific scholarly feedback stays available below when needed.

Log in to curate

Reading frame

Keep the important context close to the paper

Keep the important signals around this paper in one place: votes, save state, collection context, reviews and the metadata you need before deciding what to do next.

Institutions

Add specific reaction

Move through the context

Research map

Open full explorer

Move through nearby people, institutions, topics and adjacent work without leaving the paper page.

Building this map preview

BZPEER is loading the nearby papers, people, topics and institutions for this page.

Structured reviews

0 review(s)

ContributeLeave structured feedbackUse the review template when you have a concrete strength, concern or method question.Open review form

No structured reviews yet. High-signal critique starts here.

Work discussion

0 comment(s)

DiscussAdd a high-signal commentKeep quick notes, caveats and replication pointers separate from formal reviews.Open comment form

No discussion yet. The first strong comment sets the tone.