Paper detail

Homogeneous Formulation of Convex Quadratic Programs for Infeasibility Detection

Convex Quadratic Programs (QPs) have come to play a central role in the computation of control action for constrained dynamical systems. In this paper, we present a novel Homogeneous QP (HQP) formulation which is obtained by embedding the original QP in a larger space. The key properties of the HQP are: (i) is always feasible, (ii) an optimal solution to QP can be readily obtained from a solution to HQP, and (iii) infeasibility of QP corresponds to a particular solution of HQP. An immediate consequence is that all the existing algorithms for QP are now also capable of robustly detecting infeasibility. In particular, we present an Infeasible Interior Point Method (IIPM) for the HQP and show polynomial iteration complexity when applied to HQP. A key distinction with prior IPM approaches is that we do not need to solve second-order cone programs. Numerical experiments on the formulation are provided using existing codes.

preprint2021arXivOpen access
0citations
0reviews
0saves
Nocode
Nodataset
0institutions

Next steps

Decide what to do with this paper

Use like or dislike for the fast social read. The more specific scholarly feedback stays available below when needed.

Log in to curate

Reading frame

Keep the important context close to the paper

Keep the important signals around this paper in one place: votes, save state, collection context, reviews and the metadata you need before deciding what to do next.

Institutions

Add specific reaction

Move through the context

Research map

Open full explorer

Move through nearby people, institutions, topics and adjacent work without leaving the paper page.

Building this graph slice

BZPEER is loading the nearby papers, people, topics and institutions for this page.

Structured reviews

0 review(s)

ContributeLeave structured feedbackUse the review template when you have a concrete strength, concern or method question.Open review form

No structured reviews yet. High-signal critique starts here.

Work discussion

0 comment(s)

DiscussAdd a high-signal commentKeep quick notes, caveats and replication pointers separate from formal reviews.Open comment form

No discussion yet. The first strong comment sets the tone.