Paper detail

Holographic Relation in Yang's Quantized Space-Time Algebra and Area-Entropy Relation in $D_0$ Brane Gas System. II

We investigate a possible inner relation between the familiar Bekenstein-Hawking area-entropy relation and ours presented in a simple $D_0$ brane gas model on the basis of the kinematical holographic relation [KHR] in the Yang's quantized space-time algebra (YSTA). We find out that the relation between them is well understood through the idea of an {\it elementary} Schwarzschild black hole realized on a single $[site]$ of Planckian scale in our scheme. Related arguments possibly explain the origin of a certain kind of universality as seen in $η=1/4$ in the Bekenstein-Hawking relation and lead us to notice the similarity between the effective mass of $D_0$ brane, $μ_S,$ inside black holes and the Hawking radiation temperature, $T_{H.R.} ( = 1/(8πM_S) )$, both inversely proportional to the black hole mass $M_S$ and having almost the same order of magnitude. Motivated by this fact, we introduce in our scheme an ansatz which enables us self-consistently to equate $μ_S$ to $T_{H.R.}$ and leads us to an area-entropy relation with $η$ slightly shifted from $1/4.$

preprint2010arXivOpen access

Signal facts

What is known right now

Open access1 author1 topic

Next steps

Decide what to do with this paper

Use like or dislike for the fast social read. The more specific scholarly feedback stays available below when needed.

Log in to curate

Reading frame

Keep the important context close to the paper

Keep the important signals around this paper in one place: votes, save state, collection context, reviews and the metadata you need before deciding what to do next.

Authors

Institutions

Add specific reaction

Move through the context

Research map

Open full explorer

Move through nearby people, institutions, topics and adjacent work without leaving the paper page.

Building this map preview

BZPEER is loading the nearby papers, people, topics and institutions for this page.

Structured reviews

0 review(s)

ContributeLeave structured feedbackUse the review template when you have a concrete strength, concern or method question.Open review form

No structured reviews yet. High-signal critique starts here.

Work discussion

0 comment(s)

DiscussAdd a high-signal commentKeep quick notes, caveats and replication pointers separate from formal reviews.Open comment form

No discussion yet. The first strong comment sets the tone.