Paper detail

Holographic Dark Energy with Cosmological Constant

Inspired by the multiverse scenario, we study a heterotic dark energy model in which there are two parts, the first being the cosmological constant and the second being the holographic dark energy, thus this model is named the $Λ$HDE model. By studying the $Λ$HDE model theoretically, we find that the parameters $d$ and $Ω_{hde}$ are divided into a few domains in which the fate of the universe is quite different. We investigate dynamical behaviors of this model, and especially the future evolution of the universe. We perform fitting analysis on the cosmological parameters in the $Λ$HDE model by using the recent observational data. We find the model yields $χ^2_{\rm min}=426.27$ when constrained by $\rm Planck+SNLS3+BAO+HST$, comparable to the results of the HDE model (428.20) and the concordant $Λ$CDM model (431.35). At 68.3\% CL, we obtain $-0.07<Ω_{\Lambda0}<0.68$ and correspondingly $0.04<Ω_{hde0}<0.79$, implying at present there is considerable degeneracy between the holographic dark energy and cosmological constant components in the $Λ$HDE model.

preprint2015arXivOpen access

Signal facts

What is known right now

Open access4 authors1 topic

Next steps

Decide what to do with this paper

Use like or dislike for the fast social read. The more specific scholarly feedback stays available below when needed.

Log in to curate

Reading frame

Keep the important context close to the paper

Keep the important signals around this paper in one place: votes, save state, collection context, reviews and the metadata you need before deciding what to do next.

Institutions

Add specific reaction

Move through the context

Research map

Open full explorer

Move through nearby people, institutions, topics and adjacent work without leaving the paper page.

Building this map preview

BZPEER is loading the nearby papers, people, topics and institutions for this page.

Structured reviews

0 review(s)

ContributeLeave structured feedbackUse the review template when you have a concrete strength, concern or method question.Open review form

No structured reviews yet. High-signal critique starts here.

Work discussion

0 comment(s)

DiscussAdd a high-signal commentKeep quick notes, caveats and replication pointers separate from formal reviews.Open comment form

No discussion yet. The first strong comment sets the tone.