Paper detail

Holographic Consistency and the Sign of the Gauss-Bonnet Parameter

If Einstein-Gauss-Bonnet gravity is obtained as a low energy limit of string theory, then the Gauss-Bonnet parameter $α$ is essentially the inverse string tension and thus necessarily positive. If one treats Einstein-Gauss-Bonnet gravity as a modified theory of gravity in the anti-de Sitter bulk in the bottom-up approach of holography, then there is no obvious restriction on the sign of the parameter a priori, though various studies involving boundary causality have restricted the possible range of $α$. In this short note, we argue that if holographic descriptions are to be consistent, then the Gauss-Bonnet parameter has to be positive. This follows from a geometric consistency condition in the Euclidean picture. From the Lorentzian signature perspective, black holes with a negative $α$ lead to uncontrolled brane nucleation in the bulk and so the supposedly static geometry is untenable. In fact, even the ground state without a black hole is problematic. In other words, the bottom-up approach agrees with the top-down approach on the sign of the parameter. Some possible loopholes of the conclusion are discussed.

preprint2022arXivOpen access

Signal facts

What is known right now

Open access1 author2 topics

Next steps

Decide what to do with this paper

Use like or dislike for the fast social read. The more specific scholarly feedback stays available below when needed.

Log in to curate

Reading frame

Keep the important context close to the paper

Keep the important signals around this paper in one place: votes, save state, collection context, reviews and the metadata you need before deciding what to do next.

Institutions

Add specific reaction

Move through the context

Research map

Open full explorer

Move through nearby people, institutions, topics and adjacent work without leaving the paper page.

Building this map preview

BZPEER is loading the nearby papers, people, topics and institutions for this page.

Structured reviews

0 review(s)

ContributeLeave structured feedbackUse the review template when you have a concrete strength, concern or method question.Open review form

No structured reviews yet. High-signal critique starts here.

Work discussion

0 comment(s)

DiscussAdd a high-signal commentKeep quick notes, caveats and replication pointers separate from formal reviews.Open comment form

No discussion yet. The first strong comment sets the tone.