Paper detail

Hoffman-London graphs: When paths minimize $H$-colorings among trees

Given a graph $G$ and a target graph $H$, an $H$-coloring of $G$ is an adjacency-preserving vertex map from $G$ to $H$. The number of $H$-colorings of $G$, $\hom(G,H)$, has been studied for many classes of $G$ and $H$. In particular, extremal questions of maximizing and minimizing $\hom(G,H)$ have been considered when $H$ is a clique or $G$ is a tree. In this paper, we develop a new technique using automorphisms of $H$ to show that $\hom(T,H)$ is minimized by paths as $T$ varies over trees on a fixed number of vertices. We introduce the term Hoffman-London to refer to graphs that are minimal in this sense. In particular, we define an automorphic similarity matrix which is used to compute $\hom(T,H)$ and give matrix conditions under which $H$ is Hoffman-London. We then apply this technique to identify several families of graphs that are Hoffman-London, including loop threshold graphs and some with applications in statistical physics (e.g. the Widom-Rowlinson model). By combining our approach with a few other observations, we fully characterize the minimizing trees for all graphs $H$ on three or fewer vertices.

preprint2025arXivOpen access

Signal facts

What is known right now

Open access5 authors1 topic

Next steps

Decide what to do with this paper

Use like or dislike for the fast social read. The more specific scholarly feedback stays available below when needed.

Log in to curate

Reading frame

Keep the important context close to the paper

Keep the important signals around this paper in one place: votes, save state, collection context, reviews and the metadata you need before deciding what to do next.

Institutions

Add specific reaction

Move through the context

Research map

Open full explorer

Move through nearby people, institutions, topics and adjacent work without leaving the paper page.

Building this map preview

BZPEER is loading the nearby papers, people, topics and institutions for this page.

Structured reviews

0 review(s)

ContributeLeave structured feedbackUse the review template when you have a concrete strength, concern or method question.Open review form

No structured reviews yet. High-signal critique starts here.

Work discussion

0 comment(s)

DiscussAdd a high-signal commentKeep quick notes, caveats and replication pointers separate from formal reviews.Open comment form

No discussion yet. The first strong comment sets the tone.