Paper detail

Hodge theoretic reward allocation for generalized cooperative games on graphs

This paper generalizes L.S. Shapley's celebrated value allocation theory on coalition games by discovering and applying a fundamental connection between stochastic path integration driven by canonical time-reversible Markov chains and Hodge-theoretic discrete Poisson's equations on general weighted graphs. More precisely, we begin by defining cooperative games on general graphs and generalize Shapley's value allocation formula for those games in terms of stochastic path integral driven by the associated canonical Markov chain. We then show the value allocation operator, one for each player defined by the path integral, turns out to be the solution to the Poisson's equation defined via the combinatorial Hodge decomposition on general weighted graphs. Several motivational examples and applications are presented, in particular, a section is devoted to reinterpret and extend Nash's and Kohlberg and Neyman's solution concept for cooperative games. This and other examples, e.g. on revenue management, suggest that our general framework does not have to be restricted to cooperative games setup, but may apply to broader range of problems arising in economics, finance and other social and physical sciences.

preprint2022arXivOpen access
0citations
0reviews
0saves
Nocode
Nodataset
0institutions

Next steps

Decide what to do with this paper

Use like or dislike for the fast social read. The more specific scholarly feedback stays available below when needed.

Log in to curate

Reading frame

Keep the important context close to the paper

Keep the important signals around this paper in one place: votes, save state, collection context, reviews and the metadata you need before deciding what to do next.

Institutions

Add specific reaction

Move through the context

Research map

Open full explorer

Move through nearby people, institutions, topics and adjacent work without leaving the paper page.

Building this graph slice

BZPEER is loading the nearby papers, people, topics and institutions for this page.

Structured reviews

0 review(s)

ContributeLeave structured feedbackUse the review template when you have a concrete strength, concern or method question.Open review form

No structured reviews yet. High-signal critique starts here.

Work discussion

0 comment(s)

DiscussAdd a high-signal commentKeep quick notes, caveats and replication pointers separate from formal reviews.Open comment form

No discussion yet. The first strong comment sets the tone.