Paper detail

Hodge-elliptic genera and how they govern K3 theories

The (complex) Hodge-elliptic genus and its conformal field theoretic counterpart were recently introduced by Kachru and Tripathy, refining the traditional complex elliptic genus. We construct a different, so-called chiral Hodge-elliptic genus, which is expected to agree with the generic conformal field theoretic Hodge-elliptic genus, in contrast to the complex Hodge-elliptic genus as originally defined. For K3 surfaces X, the chiral Hodge-elliptic genus is shown to be independent of all moduli. Moreover, employing Kapustin's results on infinite volume limits it is shown that it agrees with the generic conformal field theoretic Hodge-elliptic genus of K3 theories, while the complex Hodge-elliptic genus does not. This new invariant governs part of the field content of K3 theories, supporting the idea that all their spaces of states have a common subspace which underlies the generic conformal field theoretic Hodge-elliptic genus, and thereby the complex elliptic genus. Mathematically, this space is modelled by the sheaf cohomology of the chiral de Rham complex of X. It decomposes into irreducible representations of the N=4 superconformal algebra such that the multiplicity spaces of all massive representations have precisely the dimensions required in order to furnish the representation of the Mathieu group M24 that is predicted by Mathieu Moonshine. This is interpreted as evidence in favour of the ideas of symmetry surfing, which have been proposed by Taormina and the author, along with the claim that the sheaf cohomology of the chiral de Rham complex is a natural home for Mathieu Moonshine. These investigations also imply that the generic chiral algebra of K3 theories is precisely the N=4 superconformal algebra at central charge c=6, if the usual predictions on infinite volume limits from string theory hold true.

preprint2019arXivOpen access

Signal facts

What is known right now

Open access1 author6 topics

Next steps

Decide what to do with this paper

Use like or dislike for the fast social read. The more specific scholarly feedback stays available below when needed.

Log in to curate

Reading frame

Keep the important context close to the paper

Keep the important signals around this paper in one place: votes, save state, collection context, reviews and the metadata you need before deciding what to do next.

Institutions

Add specific reaction

Move through the context

Research map

Open full explorer

Move through nearby people, institutions, topics and adjacent work without leaving the paper page.

Building this map preview

BZPEER is loading the nearby papers, people, topics and institutions for this page.

Structured reviews

0 review(s)

ContributeLeave structured feedbackUse the review template when you have a concrete strength, concern or method question.Open review form

No structured reviews yet. High-signal critique starts here.

Work discussion

0 comment(s)

DiscussAdd a high-signal commentKeep quick notes, caveats and replication pointers separate from formal reviews.Open comment form

No discussion yet. The first strong comment sets the tone.