Paper detail

Hitting probabilities for general Gaussian processes

For a scalar Gaussian process $B$ on $\mathbb{R}_{+}$ with a prescribed general variance function $γ^{2}\left(r\right) =\mathrm{Var}\left(B\left(r\right) \right) $ and a canonical metric $\mathrm{E}[\left(B\left(t\right) -B\left(s\right) \right) ^{2}]$ which is commensurate with $γ^{2}\left(t-s\right) $, we estimate the probability for a vector of $d$ iid copies of $B$ to hit a bounded set $A$ in $\mathbb{R}^{d}$, with conditions on $γ$ which place no restrictions of power type or of approximate self-similarity, assuming only that $γ$ is continuous, increasing, and concave, with $γ\left(0\right) =0$ and $γ^{\prime}\left(0+\right) =+\infty$. We identify optimal base (kernel) functions which depend explicitly on $γ$, to derive upper and lower bounds on the hitting probability in terms of the corresponding generalized Hausdorff measure and non-Newtonian capacity of $A$ respectively. The proofs borrow and extend some recent progress for hitting probabilities estimation, including the notion of two-point local-nondeterminism in Biermé, Lacaux, and Xiao \cite{Bierme:09}.

preprint2014arXivOpen access
0citations
0reviews
0saves
Nocode
Nodataset
0institutions

Next steps

Decide what to do with this paper

Use like or dislike for the fast social read. The more specific scholarly feedback stays available below when needed.

Log in to curate

Reading frame

Keep the important context close to the paper

Keep the important signals around this paper in one place: votes, save state, collection context, reviews and the metadata you need before deciding what to do next.

Institutions

Add specific reaction

Move through the context

Research map

Open full explorer

Move through nearby people, institutions, topics and adjacent work without leaving the paper page.

Building this graph slice

BZPEER is loading the nearby papers, people, topics and institutions for this page.

Structured reviews

0 review(s)

ContributeLeave structured feedbackUse the review template when you have a concrete strength, concern or method question.Open review form

No structured reviews yet. High-signal critique starts here.

Work discussion

0 comment(s)

DiscussAdd a high-signal commentKeep quick notes, caveats and replication pointers separate from formal reviews.Open comment form

No discussion yet. The first strong comment sets the tone.