Paper detail

Hint of a truncated primordial spectrum from the CMB large-scale anomalies

Several satellite missions have uncovered a series of potential anomalies in the fluctuation spectrum of the cosmic microwave background temperature, including: (1) an unexpectedly low level of correlation at large angles, manifested via the angular correlation function, C(theta); and (2) missing power in the low multipole moments of the angular power spectrum, C_ell. Their origin is still debated, however, due to a persistent lack of clarity concerning the seeding of quantum fluctuations in the early Universe. A likely explanation for the first of these appears to be a cutoff, k_min=(3.14 +/- 0.36) x 10^{-4} Mpc^{-1}, in the primordial power spectrum, P(k). Our goal in this paper is twofold: (1) we examine whether the same k_min can also self-consistently explain the missing power at large angles, and (2) we confirm that the of this cutoff in P(k) does not adversely affect the remarkable consistency between the prediction of Planck-LCDM and the Planck measurements at ell > 30. We use the publicly available code CAMB to calculate the angular power spectrum, based on a line-of-sight approach. The code is modified slightly to include the additional parameter (i.e., k_min) characterizing the primordial power spectrum. In addition to this cutoff, the code optimizes all of the usual standard-model parameters. In fitting the angular power spectrum, we find an optimized cutoff, k_min = 2.04^{+1.4}_{-0.79} x 10^{-4} Mpc^{-1}, when using the whole range of ell's, and k_min=3.3^{+1.7}_{-1.3} x 10^{-4} Mpc^{-1}, when fitting only the range ell < 30, where the Sachs-Wolfe effect is dominant. These are fully consistent with the value inferred from C(theta), suggesting that both of these large-angle anomalies may be due to the same truncation in P(k).

preprint2021arXivOpen access

Signal facts

What is known right now

Open access4 authors1 topic

Next steps

Decide what to do with this paper

Use like or dislike for the fast social read. The more specific scholarly feedback stays available below when needed.

Log in to curate

Reading frame

Keep the important context close to the paper

Keep the important signals around this paper in one place: votes, save state, collection context, reviews and the metadata you need before deciding what to do next.

Institutions

Add specific reaction

Move through the context

Research map

Open full explorer

Move through nearby people, institutions, topics and adjacent work without leaving the paper page.

Building this map preview

BZPEER is loading the nearby papers, people, topics and institutions for this page.

Structured reviews

0 review(s)

ContributeLeave structured feedbackUse the review template when you have a concrete strength, concern or method question.Open review form

No structured reviews yet. High-signal critique starts here.

Work discussion

0 comment(s)

DiscussAdd a high-signal commentKeep quick notes, caveats and replication pointers separate from formal reviews.Open comment form

No discussion yet. The first strong comment sets the tone.