Paper detail

Hint at an axion-like particle from the redshift dependence of blazar spectra

We consider the largest observed sample including all intermediate-frequency peaked (IBL) and high-frequency peaked (HBL) flaring blazars above 100 GeV up to redshift $z = 0.6$. We show that the best-fit regression line of the emitted spectral indices $Γ_{\rm em} (z)$ is a concave parabola decreasing as $z$ increases, thereby implying a statistical correlation between the $\{Γ_{\rm em} (z) \}$ distribution and $z$. This result contradicts our expectation that such a distribution should be $z$-independent. We argue that the above correlation does not arise from any selection bias. We show that our expectation naturally emerges provided that axion-like particles (ALPs) are put into the game. Moreover, ALPs can also explain why flat spectrum radio quasars emit up to 400 GeV, in sharp contradiction with conventional physics. So, the combination of the two very different but consistent results -- taken at face value -- leads to a hint at an ALP with mass $m = {\cal O} (10^{-10} \, {\rm eV})$ and two-photon coupling in the range $2.94 \times 10^{- 12} \, {\rm GeV}^{- 1} < g_{a γγ} < 0.66 \times 10^{- 10} \, {\rm GeV}^{- 1}$. As a bonus, the Universe would become considerably more transparent above energies $E \gtrsim 1 \, {\rm TeV}$ than dictated by conventional physics. Our prediction can be checked not only by the new generation of observatories like CTA, HAWC, GAMMA-400, LHAASO, TAIGA-HiSCORE and HERD, but also thanks to the planned laboratory experiments ALPS II (upgraded), STAX, IAXO and with other techniques now being developed by Avignone and collaborators.

preprint2020arXivOpen access

Signal facts

What is known right now

Open access4 authors2 topics

Next steps

Decide what to do with this paper

Use like or dislike for the fast social read. The more specific scholarly feedback stays available below when needed.

Log in to curate

Reading frame

Keep the important context close to the paper

Keep the important signals around this paper in one place: votes, save state, collection context, reviews and the metadata you need before deciding what to do next.

Institutions

Add specific reaction

Move through the context

Research map

Open full explorer

Move through nearby people, institutions, topics and adjacent work without leaving the paper page.

Building this map preview

BZPEER is loading the nearby papers, people, topics and institutions for this page.

Structured reviews

0 review(s)

ContributeLeave structured feedbackUse the review template when you have a concrete strength, concern or method question.Open review form

No structured reviews yet. High-signal critique starts here.

Work discussion

0 comment(s)

DiscussAdd a high-signal commentKeep quick notes, caveats and replication pointers separate from formal reviews.Open comment form

No discussion yet. The first strong comment sets the tone.