Paper detail

Hilbert Statistics of Vorticity Scaling in Two-Dimensional Turbulence

In this paper, the scaling property of the inverse energy cascade and forward enstrophy cascade of the vorticity filed $ω(x,y)$ in two-dimensional (2D) turbulence is analyzed. This is accomplished by applying a Hilbert-based technique, namely Hilbert-Huang Transform, to a vorticity field obtained from a $8192^2$ grid-points direct numerical simulation of the 2D turbulence with a forcing scale $k_f=100$ and an Ekman friction. The measured joint probability density function $p(C,k)$ of mode $C_i(x)$ of the vorticity $ω$ and instantaneous wavenumber $k(x)$ is separated by the forcing scale $k_f$ into two parts, which corresponding to the inverse energy cascade and the forward enstrophy cascade. It is found that all conditional pdf $p(C\vert k)$ at given wavenumber $k$ has an exponential tail. In the inverse energy cascade, the shape of $p(C\vert k)$ does collapse with each other, indicating a nonintermittent cascade. The measured scaling exponent $ζ_ω^I(q)$ is linear with the statistical order $q$, i.e., $ζ_ω^I(q)=-q/3$, confirming the nonintermittent cascade process. In the forward enstrophy cascade, the core part of $p(C\vert k)$ is changing with wavenumber $k$, indicating an intermittent forward cascade. The measured scaling exponent $ζ_ω^F(q)$ is nonlinear with $q$ and can be described very well by a log-Poisson fitting: $ζ_ω^F(q)=\frac{1}{3}q+0.45\left(1-0.43^{q}\right)$. However, the extracted vorticity scaling exponents $ζ_ω(q)$ for both inverse energy cascade and forward enstrophy cascade are not consistent with Kraichnan\rq{}s theory prediction. New theory for the vorticity field in 2D turbulence is required to interpret the observed scaling behavior.

preprint2014arXivOpen access
0citations
0reviews
0saves
Nocode
Nodataset
0institutions

Next steps

Decide what to do with this paper

Use like or dislike for the fast social read. The more specific scholarly feedback stays available below when needed.

Log in to curate

Reading frame

Keep the important context close to the paper

Keep the important signals around this paper in one place: votes, save state, collection context, reviews and the metadata you need before deciding what to do next.

Institutions

Add specific reaction

Move through the context

Research map

Open full explorer

Move through nearby people, institutions, topics and adjacent work without leaving the paper page.

Building this map preview

BZPEER is loading the nearby papers, people, topics and institutions for this page.

Structured reviews

0 review(s)

ContributeLeave structured feedbackUse the review template when you have a concrete strength, concern or method question.Open review form

No structured reviews yet. High-signal critique starts here.

Work discussion

0 comment(s)

DiscussAdd a high-signal commentKeep quick notes, caveats and replication pointers separate from formal reviews.Open comment form

No discussion yet. The first strong comment sets the tone.