Paper detail

Hilberg Exponents: New Measures of Long Memory in the Process

The paper concerns the rates of power-law growth of mutual information computed for a stationary measure or for a universal code. The rates are called Hilberg exponents and four such quantities are defined for each measure and each code: two random exponents and two expected exponents. A particularly interesting case arises for conditional algorithmic mutual information. In this case, the random Hilberg exponents are almost surely constant on ergodic sources and are bounded by the expected Hilberg exponents. This property is a "second-order" analogue of the Shannon-McMillan-Breiman theorem, proved without invoking the ergodic theorem. It carries over to Hilberg exponents for the underlying probability measure via Shannon-Fano coding and Barron inequality. Moreover, the expected Hilberg exponents can be linked for different universal codes. Namely, if one code dominates another, the expected Hilberg exponents are greater for the former than for the latter. The paper is concluded by an evaluation of Hilberg exponents for certain sources such as the mixture Bernoulli process and the Santa Fe processes.

preprint2015arXivOpen access

Signal facts

What is known right now

Open access1 author2 topics

Next steps

Decide what to do with this paper

Use like or dislike for the fast social read. The more specific scholarly feedback stays available below when needed.

Log in to curate

Reading frame

Keep the important context close to the paper

Keep the important signals around this paper in one place: votes, save state, collection context, reviews and the metadata you need before deciding what to do next.

Institutions

Add specific reaction

Move through the context

Research map

Open full explorer

Move through nearby people, institutions, topics and adjacent work without leaving the paper page.

Building this map preview

BZPEER is loading the nearby papers, people, topics and institutions for this page.

Structured reviews

0 review(s)

ContributeLeave structured feedbackUse the review template when you have a concrete strength, concern or method question.Open review form

No structured reviews yet. High-signal critique starts here.

Work discussion

0 comment(s)

DiscussAdd a high-signal commentKeep quick notes, caveats and replication pointers separate from formal reviews.Open comment form

No discussion yet. The first strong comment sets the tone.