Paper detail

HII region variability and pre-main-sequence evolution

Recent observations and simulations have suggested that HII regions around massive stars may vary in their size and emitted flux on timescales short enough to be observed. This variability can have a number of causes, ranging from environmental causes to variability of the ionizing source itself. We explore the latter possibility by considering the pre-main-sequence evolution of massive protostars and conducting numerical simulations with ionizing radiation feedback using the FLASH AMR hydrodynamics code. We investigate three different models: a simple ZAMS model, a self-consistent one-zone model by Offner et al. (2009), and a model fit to the tracks computed by Hosokawa & Omukai (2009). The protostellar models show that hypercompact HII regions around massive, isolated protostars collapse or shrink from diameters of 80 or 300 AU, depending on the model choice, down to near absence during the swelling of stellar radius that accompanies the protostar's transition from a convective to a radiative internal structure. This occurs on timescales as short as ~3000 years.

preprint2012arXivOpen access
0citations
0reviews
0saves
Nocode
Nodataset
0institutions

Next steps

Decide what to do with this paper

Use like or dislike for the fast social read. The more specific scholarly feedback stays available below when needed.

Log in to curate

Reading frame

Keep the important context close to the paper

Keep the important signals around this paper in one place: votes, save state, collection context, reviews and the metadata you need before deciding what to do next.

Institutions

Add specific reaction

Move through the context

Research map

Open full explorer

Move through nearby people, institutions, topics and adjacent work without leaving the paper page.

Building this graph slice

BZPEER is loading the nearby papers, people, topics and institutions for this page.

Structured reviews

0 review(s)

ContributeLeave structured feedbackUse the review template when you have a concrete strength, concern or method question.Open review form

No structured reviews yet. High-signal critique starts here.

Work discussion

0 comment(s)

DiscussAdd a high-signal commentKeep quick notes, caveats and replication pointers separate from formal reviews.Open comment form

No discussion yet. The first strong comment sets the tone.