Paper detail

Highly coherent kilohertz quasi-periodic oscillations from a neutron star X-ray binary EXO 1745-248

We report the discovery ($20σ$) of kilohertz quasi-periodic oscillations (kHz QPOs) at ~ 690 Hz from the transient neutron star low-mass X-ray binary EXO 1745-248. We find that this is a lower kHz QPO, and systematically study the time variation of its properties using smaller data segments with and without the shift-and-add technique. The quality (Q) factor occasionally significantly varies within short ranges of frequency and time. A high Q-factor (264.5 +- 38.5) of the QPO is found for a 200 s time segment, which might be the largest value reported in the literature. We argue that an effective way to rule out kHz QPO models is to observationally find such high Q-factors, even for a short duration, as many models cannot explain a high coherence. However, as we demonstrate, the shift-and-add technique cannot find a very high Q-factor which appears for a short period of time. This shows that the coherences of kHz QPOs can be higher than the already high values reported using this technique, implying further constraints on models. We also discuss the energy dependence of fractional rms amplitude and Q-factor of the kHz QPO.

preprint2011arXivOpen access

Signal facts

What is known right now

Open access2 authors3 topics

Next steps

Decide what to do with this paper

Use like or dislike for the fast social read. The more specific scholarly feedback stays available below when needed.

Log in to curate

Reading frame

Keep the important context close to the paper

Keep the important signals around this paper in one place: votes, save state, collection context, reviews and the metadata you need before deciding what to do next.

Institutions

Add specific reaction

Move through the context

Research map

Open full explorer

Move through nearby people, institutions, topics and adjacent work without leaving the paper page.

Building this map preview

BZPEER is loading the nearby papers, people, topics and institutions for this page.

Structured reviews

0 review(s)

ContributeLeave structured feedbackUse the review template when you have a concrete strength, concern or method question.Open review form

No structured reviews yet. High-signal critique starts here.

Work discussion

0 comment(s)

DiscussAdd a high-signal commentKeep quick notes, caveats and replication pointers separate from formal reviews.Open comment form

No discussion yet. The first strong comment sets the tone.