Paper detail

Higher regularity of homeomorphisms in the Hartman-Grobman theorem for semilinear evolution equations

Hein and Prüss [J. Differential Equations, 261(2016)4709-4727] presented a version of Hartman-Grobman type $C^{0}$ linearization result for semilinear hyperbolic evolution equations. They showed that the linearising map (homomorphism) and its inverse are Hölder continuous. An important question: is it possible to improve the regularity of the homomorphisms? In the present paper, we prove that if the mild solutions of semilinear system are bounded, then the regularity of the homomorphisms is Lipchitzian, but the inverse is merely Hölder continuous. We also give a generalized local linearization result in this paper. Finally, some applications end the paper. As pointed out by Backes [J. Differential Equations, 297 (2021) 536-574], even if the diffeomorphism $F$ is $C^{\infty}$, the homomorphism can fail to be locally Lipschitz. The homomorphisms are in general only locally Hölder continuous. However, by establishing two effective dichotomy integral inequalities, we prove that the conjugacy is Lipchitzian, but the inverse is Hölder continuous. Our result is the first one to observe the higher regularity of homomorphisms in the Hartman-Grobman theorem.

preprint2022arXivOpen access

Signal facts

What is known right now

Open access3 authors1 topic

Next steps

Decide what to do with this paper

Use like or dislike for the fast social read. The more specific scholarly feedback stays available below when needed.

Log in to curate

Reading frame

Keep the important context close to the paper

Keep the important signals around this paper in one place: votes, save state, collection context, reviews and the metadata you need before deciding what to do next.

Institutions

Add specific reaction

Move through the context

Research map

Open full explorer

Move through nearby people, institutions, topics and adjacent work without leaving the paper page.

Building this map preview

BZPEER is loading the nearby papers, people, topics and institutions for this page.

Structured reviews

0 review(s)

ContributeLeave structured feedbackUse the review template when you have a concrete strength, concern or method question.Open review form

No structured reviews yet. High-signal critique starts here.

Work discussion

0 comment(s)

DiscussAdd a high-signal commentKeep quick notes, caveats and replication pointers separate from formal reviews.Open comment form

No discussion yet. The first strong comment sets the tone.