Paper detail

Higher regularity of homeomorphisms in the Hartman-Grobman theorem and a conjecture on its sharpness

Hartman-Grobman theorem states that there is a homeomorphism H sending the solutions of the nonlinear system onto those of its linearization under suitable assumptions. Many mathematicians have made contributions to prove Hölder continuity of the homeomorphisms. However, is it possible to improve the Hölder continuity to Lipschitzian continuity? This paper gives a positive answer. We formulate the first result that the homeomorphism is Lipschitzian, but not $C^1$, while its inverse is merely Hölder continuous, but not Lipschitzian. It is interesting that the regularity of the homeomorphism is different from its inverse. Moreover, some illustrative examples are presented to show the effectiveness of our results. Further, motivated by our example, we also propose a conjecture, saying, the regularity of the homeomorphisms is sharp and it could not be improved any more.

preprint2022arXivOpen access

Signal facts

What is known right now

Open access3 authors1 topic

Next steps

Decide what to do with this paper

Use like or dislike for the fast social read. The more specific scholarly feedback stays available below when needed.

Log in to curate

Reading frame

Keep the important context close to the paper

Keep the important signals around this paper in one place: votes, save state, collection context, reviews and the metadata you need before deciding what to do next.

Institutions

Add specific reaction

Move through the context

Research map

Open full explorer

Move through nearby people, institutions, topics and adjacent work without leaving the paper page.

Building this map preview

BZPEER is loading the nearby papers, people, topics and institutions for this page.

Structured reviews

0 review(s)

ContributeLeave structured feedbackUse the review template when you have a concrete strength, concern or method question.Open review form

No structured reviews yet. High-signal critique starts here.

Work discussion

0 comment(s)

DiscussAdd a high-signal commentKeep quick notes, caveats and replication pointers separate from formal reviews.Open comment form

No discussion yet. The first strong comment sets the tone.