Paper detail

Higher order corrected trapezoidal rules in Lebesgue and Alexiewicz spaces

If $f\!:\![a,b]\to\R$ such that $f^{(n)}$ is integrable then integration by parts gives the formula \begin{align*} &\intab f(x)\,dx = &\frac{(-1)^n}{n!}\sum_{k=0}^{n-1}(-1)^{n-k-1}\left[ ϕ_n^{(n-k-1)}(a)f^{(k)}(a)- ϕ_n^{(n-k-1)}(b)f^{(k)}(b)\right] +E_n(f), \end{align*} where $ϕ_n$ is a monic polynomial of degree $n$ and the error is given by $E_n(f)=\frac{(-1)^n}{n!}\int_a^b f^{(n)}(x)ϕ_n(x)\,dx$. This then gives a quadrature formula for $\int_a^bf(x)\,dx$. The polynomial $ϕ_n$ is chosen to optimize the error estimate under the assumption that $f^{(n)}\in L^p([a,b])$ for some $1\leq p\leq\infty$ or if $f^{(n)}$ is integrable in the distributional or Henstock--Kurzweil sense. Sharp error estimates are obtained. It is shown that this formula is exact for all such $ϕ_n$ if $f$ is a polynomial of degree at most $n-1$. If $ϕ_n$ is a Legendre polynomial then the formula is exact for $f$ a polynomial of degree at most $2n-1$.

preprint2016arXivOpen access

Signal facts

What is known right now

Open access1 author2 topics

Next steps

Decide what to do with this paper

Use like or dislike for the fast social read. The more specific scholarly feedback stays available below when needed.

Log in to curate

Reading frame

Keep the important context close to the paper

Keep the important signals around this paper in one place: votes, save state, collection context, reviews and the metadata you need before deciding what to do next.

Institutions

Add specific reaction

Move through the context

Research map

Open full explorer

Move through nearby people, institutions, topics and adjacent work without leaving the paper page.

Building this map preview

BZPEER is loading the nearby papers, people, topics and institutions for this page.

Structured reviews

0 review(s)

ContributeLeave structured feedbackUse the review template when you have a concrete strength, concern or method question.Open review form

No structured reviews yet. High-signal critique starts here.

Work discussion

0 comment(s)

DiscussAdd a high-signal commentKeep quick notes, caveats and replication pointers separate from formal reviews.Open comment form

No discussion yet. The first strong comment sets the tone.