Paper detail

Higher Martian atmospheric temperatures at all altitudes increase the D/H fractionation factor and water loss

Much of the water that once flowed on the surface of Mars was lost to space long ago, and the total amount lost remains unknown. Clues to the amount lost can be found by studying hydrogen (H) and its isotope deuterium (D), which are produced when atmospheric water molecules H$_2$O and HDO dissociate. The difference in escape efficiencies of H and D (which leads to} an enhanced D/H ratio) is referred to as the fractionation factor $f$. Both the D/H ratio and $f$ are necessary to estimate water loss; thus, if we can constrain the range of $f$ and understand what controls it, we will be able to estimate water loss more accurately. In this study, we use a 1D photochemical model of the neutral Martian atmosphere to determine how $f$ depends on assumed temperature and water vapor profiles. We find that the exobase temperature most strongly controls the value of $f$ for thermal escape processes. When we include estimates of non-thermal escape from other studies, we find that the tropopause temperature is also important. Overall, for the standard Martian atmosphere, $f=0.002$ for thermal escape, and $f=0.06$ for thermal + non-thermal escape. We estimate that Mars has lost at minimum 66-122 m GEL of water. Importantly, our results demonstrate that the value of $f$ depends critically on non-thermal escape of D, and that modeling studies that include D/H fractionation must model both neutral and ion processes throughout the atmosphere.

preprint2020arXivOpen access

Signal facts

What is known right now

Open access3 authors1 topic

Next steps

Decide what to do with this paper

Use like or dislike for the fast social read. The more specific scholarly feedback stays available below when needed.

Log in to curate

Reading frame

Keep the important context close to the paper

Keep the important signals around this paper in one place: votes, save state, collection context, reviews and the metadata you need before deciding what to do next.

Institutions

Add specific reaction

Move through the context

Research map

Open full explorer

Move through nearby people, institutions, topics and adjacent work without leaving the paper page.

Building this map preview

BZPEER is loading the nearby papers, people, topics and institutions for this page.

Structured reviews

0 review(s)

ContributeLeave structured feedbackUse the review template when you have a concrete strength, concern or method question.Open review form

No structured reviews yet. High-signal critique starts here.

Work discussion

0 comment(s)

DiscussAdd a high-signal commentKeep quick notes, caveats and replication pointers separate from formal reviews.Open comment form

No discussion yet. The first strong comment sets the tone.