Paper detail

Higher-form and (non-)Stückelberg symmetries in non-equilibrium systems

We investigate the role of higher-form symmetries in non-equilibrium systems from the perspective of effective actions defined on the Schwinger-Keldysh contour. To aid our investigation, we extend the coset construction to account for $p$-form symmetries at zero and finite temperature. Additionally we investigate how, out of equilibrium, symmetries of the action need not lead to meaningful conserved currents at the level of the equations of motion. For reasons that will become apparent, we term symmetries with conserved currents Stückelberg symmetries and those without meaningful conserved currents non-Stückelberg symmetries (NSS). Ordinarily any action constructed exclusively from building-blocks furnished by the coset construction will have Stückelberg symmetries associated with each symmetry generator. To expand the set of systems describable by the coset construction, we devise a method by which NSS generators can be included as well. While 0-form NSS are quite common in non-equilibrium effective actions, the introduction of $p$-form NSS is novel. We use these $p$-form NSS to investigate spontaneous symmetry breaking of $p$-form symmetries. We find that in non-equilibrium systems, whether or not a symmetry appears spontaneously broken can depend on the time-scale over which the system is observed. Finally, using our new coset construction, we formulate actions for a number of systems including chemically reacting fluids, Yang-Mills theory, Chern-Simons theory, magnetohydrodynamic systems, and dual superfluid and solid theories.

preprint2022arXivOpen access
0citations
0reviews
0saves
Nocode
Nodataset
0institutions

Next steps

Decide what to do with this paper

Use like or dislike for the fast social read. The more specific scholarly feedback stays available below when needed.

Log in to curate

Reading frame

Keep the important context close to the paper

Keep the important signals around this paper in one place: votes, save state, collection context, reviews and the metadata you need before deciding what to do next.

Institutions

Add specific reaction

Move through the context

Research map

Open full explorer

Move through nearby people, institutions, topics and adjacent work without leaving the paper page.

Building this graph slice

BZPEER is loading the nearby papers, people, topics and institutions for this page.

Structured reviews

0 review(s)

ContributeLeave structured feedbackUse the review template when you have a concrete strength, concern or method question.Open review form

No structured reviews yet. High-signal critique starts here.

Work discussion

0 comment(s)

DiscussAdd a high-signal commentKeep quick notes, caveats and replication pointers separate from formal reviews.Open comment form

No discussion yet. The first strong comment sets the tone.