Paper detail

Higher dimensional Frobenius problem and Lipschitz equivalence of Cantor sets

The higher dimensional Frobenius problem was introduced by a preceding paper [Fan, Rao and Zhang, Higher dimensional Frobenius problem: maximal saturated cones, growth function and rigidity, Preprint 2014]. %the higher dimensional Frobenius problem was introduced and a directional growth function was studied. In this paper, we investigate the Lipschitz equivalence of dust-like self-similar sets in $\mathbb R^d$. For any self-similar set, we associate with it a higher dimensional Frobenius problem, and we show that the directional growth function of the associate higher dimensional Frobenius problem is a Lipschitz invariant. As an application, we solve the Lipschitz equivalence problem when two dust-like self-similar sets $E$ and $F$ have coplanar ratios, by showing that they are Lipschitz equivalent if and only if the contraction vector of the $p$-th iteration of $E$ is a permutation of that of the $q$-th iteration of $F$ for some $p, q\geq 1$. This partially answers a question raised by Falconer and Marsh [On the Lipschitz equivalence of Cantor sets, \emph{Mathematika,} \textbf{39} (1992), 223--233].

preprint2014arXivOpen access
0citations
0reviews
0saves
Nocode
Nodataset
0institutions

Next steps

Decide what to do with this paper

Use like or dislike for the fast social read. The more specific scholarly feedback stays available below when needed.

Log in to curate

Reading frame

Keep the important context close to the paper

Keep the important signals around this paper in one place: votes, save state, collection context, reviews and the metadata you need before deciding what to do next.

Institutions

Add specific reaction

Move through the context

Research map

Open full explorer

Move through nearby people, institutions, topics and adjacent work without leaving the paper page.

Building this graph slice

BZPEER is loading the nearby papers, people, topics and institutions for this page.

Structured reviews

0 review(s)

ContributeLeave structured feedbackUse the review template when you have a concrete strength, concern or method question.Open review form

No structured reviews yet. High-signal critique starts here.

Work discussion

0 comment(s)

DiscussAdd a high-signal commentKeep quick notes, caveats and replication pointers separate from formal reviews.Open comment form

No discussion yet. The first strong comment sets the tone.