Paper detail

High-Time-Resolution Measurements of the Polarization of the Crab Pulsar at 1.38 GHz

Using the Westerbork Synthesis Radio Telescope (WSRT), we obtained high-time-resolution measurements of the full (linear and circular) polarization of the Crab pulsar. Taken at a resolution of 1/8192 of the 34-ms pulse period (i.e., $4.1~μ{\rm s}$), the 1.38-GHz linear-polarization measurements are in general agreement with previous lower-time-resolution 1.4-GHz measurements of linear polarization in the main pulse (MP), in the interpulse (IP), and in the low-frequency component (LFC). We find the MP and IP to be linearly polarized at about $24\%$ and $21\%$, with no discernible difference in polarization position angle. However, and contrary to theoretical expectations and measurements in the visible, we find no evidence for significant variation (sweep) in polarization position angle over the MP, the IP, or the LFC. Although, the main pulse exhibits a small but statistically significant quadratic variation in the degree of linear polarization. We discuss the implications which appear to be in contradiction to theoretical expectations. In addition, we detect weak circular polarization in the main pulse and interpulse, and strong ($\approx 20\%$) circular polarization in the low-frequency component, which also exhibits very strong ($\approx 98\%$) linear polarization at a position angle about $40\degree$ from that of the MP or IP. The pulse-mean polarization properties are consistent with the LFC being a low-altitude component and the MP and IP being high-altitude caustic components. Nevertheless, current models for the MP and IP emission do not readily account for the observed absence of pronounced polarization changes across the pulse. Finally, we measure IP and LFC pulse phases relative to the MP that are consistent with recent measurements, which have shown that the phases of these pulse components are evolving with time.

preprint2014arXivOpen access

Signal facts

What is known right now

Open access7 authors2 topics

Next steps

Decide what to do with this paper

Use like or dislike for the fast social read. The more specific scholarly feedback stays available below when needed.

Log in to curate

Reading frame

Keep the important context close to the paper

Keep the important signals around this paper in one place: votes, save state, collection context, reviews and the metadata you need before deciding what to do next.

Add specific reaction

Move through the context

Research map

Open full explorer

Move through nearby people, institutions, topics and adjacent work without leaving the paper page.

Building this map preview

BZPEER is loading the nearby papers, people, topics and institutions for this page.

Structured reviews

0 review(s)

ContributeLeave structured feedbackUse the review template when you have a concrete strength, concern or method question.Open review form

No structured reviews yet. High-signal critique starts here.

Work discussion

0 comment(s)

DiscussAdd a high-signal commentKeep quick notes, caveats and replication pointers separate from formal reviews.Open comment form

No discussion yet. The first strong comment sets the tone.