Paper detail

High-Throughput Computational-Experimental Screening Protocol for the Discovery of Bimetallic Catalysts

For decades of catalysis research, the d-band center theory that correlates the d-band center and the adsorbate binding energy has successfully enabled the accelerated discovery of novel catalyst materials. Recent studies indicate that, on top of the d-band center value, the full consideration of the d-band shapes describing higher moments of the d-band as well as sp-band properties can help better capturing surface reactivity. However, the density-of-states (DOS) patterns themselves have never been used as a descriptor in combined computational-experimental studies. Here, we propose the full DOS patterns as a key descriptor in high-throughput screening protocols, and prove its effectiveness. For the hydrogen peroxide (H2O2) synthesis as our demo catalytic reaction, the present study focuses on discovering bimetallic catalysts that can replace the prototypic palladium (Pd) one. Through a series of screening processes based on DOS pattern similarities (evaluated using first-principles calculations) and synthetic feasibility, 9 candidates are finally proposed out of 4,350 bimetallic alloy, which then are expected to have a catalytic performance comparable to that of Pd. The subsequent experimental tests demonstrate that 4 bimetallic catalysts (Ni61Pt39, Au51Pd49, Pt52Pd48, Pd52Ni48) indeed exhibit the catalytic properties comparable to those of Pd. Moreover, we discovered a novel bimetallic (Ni-Pt) catalyst, which has not yet been reported for H2O2 direct synthesis. In particular, Ni61Pt39 outperforms the prototypical Pd catalyst for the chemical reaction and exhibits a 9.5-fold enhancement in cost-normalized productivity. This protocol provides a new opportunity for the catalyst discovery for the replacement or reduction in use of the platinum-group metals.

preprint2020arXivOpen access
0citations
0reviews
0saves
Nocode
Nodataset
0institutions

Next steps

Decide what to do with this paper

Use like or dislike for the fast social read. The more specific scholarly feedback stays available below when needed.

Log in to curate

Reading frame

Keep the important context close to the paper

Keep the important signals around this paper in one place: votes, save state, collection context, reviews and the metadata you need before deciding what to do next.

Institutions

Add specific reaction

Move through the context

Research map

Open full explorer

Move through nearby people, institutions, topics and adjacent work without leaving the paper page.

Building this graph slice

BZPEER is loading the nearby papers, people, topics and institutions for this page.

Structured reviews

0 review(s)

ContributeLeave structured feedbackUse the review template when you have a concrete strength, concern or method question.Open review form

No structured reviews yet. High-signal critique starts here.

Work discussion

0 comment(s)

DiscussAdd a high-signal commentKeep quick notes, caveats and replication pointers separate from formal reviews.Open comment form

No discussion yet. The first strong comment sets the tone.