Paper detail

High-temperature oxygen monolayer structures on W(110) revisited

Systematic studies of the two high-temperature monolayer oxygen structures that exist on the (110) tungsten surface were performed using low-energy electron microscopy and diffraction measurements. Our work questions the commonly accepted interpretation from the literature that striped oxygen superstructures arise from alternating site-exchanged (S-E) domains. We postulate that the superstructures originate from a misfit between tungsten and oxygen lattices while the striped appearance corresponds to a moiré pattern. Moreover, we show that the two structures, indicated as 113- and 337-phases due to the characteristic directions of the respective moiré patterns, differ considerably in their symmetry properties. This suggests that oxygen atoms in the two overlayers occupy different adsorption sites on average. In particular, the 113-phase features rotational domains that retain mirror symmetries with respect to the [001] and [1-10] directions, whereas the 337-phase is characterized by the appearance of additional domains due to the breaking of these symmetries. We propose structural models for both phases that consistently explain their unusual properties and suggest a universal mechanism for the thermal evolution of oxygen monolayer adsorbed on W(110).

preprint2020arXivOpen access

Signal facts

What is known right now

Open access5 authors1 topic

Next steps

Decide what to do with this paper

Use like or dislike for the fast social read. The more specific scholarly feedback stays available below when needed.

Log in to curate

Reading frame

Keep the important context close to the paper

Keep the important signals around this paper in one place: votes, save state, collection context, reviews and the metadata you need before deciding what to do next.

Institutions

Add specific reaction

Move through the context

Research map

Open full explorer

Move through nearby people, institutions, topics and adjacent work without leaving the paper page.

Building this map preview

BZPEER is loading the nearby papers, people, topics and institutions for this page.

Structured reviews

0 review(s)

ContributeLeave structured feedbackUse the review template when you have a concrete strength, concern or method question.Open review form

No structured reviews yet. High-signal critique starts here.

Work discussion

0 comment(s)

DiscussAdd a high-signal commentKeep quick notes, caveats and replication pointers separate from formal reviews.Open comment form

No discussion yet. The first strong comment sets the tone.