Paper detail

High-Speed Optical Photometry of the Ultracompact X-ray Binary 4U 1626-67

Rapid UBVRI photometry of this ultracompact LMXB pulsar has detected 7.67 s optical pulsations in all five bands. The optical pulsations, which are at the same frequency as the X-ray pulsations, are understood as reprocessing of pulsed X-rays in the accretion disk or on the companion surface. The optical pulsed fraction is 6%, independent of wavelength, indicating that the optical emission is dominated by X-ray reprocessing. A weaker (1.5%) sideband, shifted down 0.395(15) mHz from the main optical pulsation, is also present. This is consistent with a previously reported sideband and corroborating the 42-min binary period proposed earlier by Middleditch et al. (1981). A 0.048 Hz optical QPO, corresponding to a known X-ray feature, was also detected in some of the observations. This is the first measurement of an optical QPO in an X-ray binary pulsar. I discuss constraints on the nature of the mass donor and show that mass transfer via a radiatively-driven wind is inconsistent with the data. I also review the basic theory of X-ray-heated accretion disks and show that such models provide a good fit to the optical photometry. If the X-ray albedo of LMXB accretion disks is as high as recently reported, then the optical data imply a distance of 8 kpc and an X-ray luminosity of 10^37 erg/s.

preprint1997arXivOpen access

Signal facts

What is known right now

Open access1 author1 topic

Next steps

Decide what to do with this paper

Use like or dislike for the fast social read. The more specific scholarly feedback stays available below when needed.

Log in to curate

Reading frame

Keep the important context close to the paper

Keep the important signals around this paper in one place: votes, save state, collection context, reviews and the metadata you need before deciding what to do next.

Institutions

Add specific reaction

Move through the context

Research map

Open full explorer

Move through nearby people, institutions, topics and adjacent work without leaving the paper page.

Building this map preview

BZPEER is loading the nearby papers, people, topics and institutions for this page.

Structured reviews

0 review(s)

ContributeLeave structured feedbackUse the review template when you have a concrete strength, concern or method question.Open review form

No structured reviews yet. High-signal critique starts here.

Work discussion

0 comment(s)

DiscussAdd a high-signal commentKeep quick notes, caveats and replication pointers separate from formal reviews.Open comment form

No discussion yet. The first strong comment sets the tone.