Paper detail

High resolution X-ray spectroscopy of Supergiant HMXB 4U1700$-$37 during the compact object eclipse

We present an analysis of the first observation of the iconic High Mass X-ray Binary \so with the \chandra High Energy Transmission Gratings during an X-ray eclipse. The goal of the observation was to study the structure/physical conditions in the clumpy stellar wind through high resolution spectroscopy. We find that: a) emission line brightness from K shell transitions, corresponding to near neutral species, directly correlates with continuum illumination. However, these lines do not greatly diminish during eclipse. This is readily explained if fluorescence K$α$ emission comes from the bulk of the wind. b) The highly ionised Fexxv and Fexxvi Ly$α$ diminish during eclipse. Thus, they must be produced in the vicinity of the compact object where $\log ξ>3$. c) to describe the emission line spectrum, the sum of two self consistent photo ionisation models with low ionisation ($\log ξ\sim -1$) and high ionisation ($\log ξ\sim 2.4$) is required. From their emission measures, the clump-to-interclump density ratio can be estimated to be $n_c/n_i\sim 300$. To fit the complex He-like \ion{Si}{xiii}{} profile, the plasma requires a broadening with $v_{\rm bulk}\sim 840$ km s$^{-1}$. Reproducing the observed $r\approx f$ line fluxes requires the addition of a third collisionally ionised plasma. d) Emission lines widths appear unresolved at the \textsc{hetg} gratings resolution with exception of Silicon. There is no clear radial segregation between (quasi)neutral and ionised species, consistent with cold wind clumps interspersed in a hot rarefied interclump medium.

preprint2020arXivOpen access

Signal facts

What is known right now

Open access9 authors1 topic

Next steps

Decide what to do with this paper

Use like or dislike for the fast social read. The more specific scholarly feedback stays available below when needed.

Log in to curate

Reading frame

Keep the important context close to the paper

Keep the important signals around this paper in one place: votes, save state, collection context, reviews and the metadata you need before deciding what to do next.

Institutions

Add specific reaction

Move through the context

Research map

Open full explorer

Move through nearby people, institutions, topics and adjacent work without leaving the paper page.

Building this map preview

BZPEER is loading the nearby papers, people, topics and institutions for this page.

Structured reviews

0 review(s)

ContributeLeave structured feedbackUse the review template when you have a concrete strength, concern or method question.Open review form

No structured reviews yet. High-signal critique starts here.

Work discussion

0 comment(s)

DiscussAdd a high-signal commentKeep quick notes, caveats and replication pointers separate from formal reviews.Open comment form

No discussion yet. The first strong comment sets the tone.