Paper detail

High-resolution ALMA observations of transition disk candidates in Lupus

Transition disks with small inner dust cavities are interesting targets for the study of disk clearing mechanisms. Such disks have been identified through a deficit in the infrared part of their SED, but spatially resolved millimeter imaging is required to confirm the presence of an inner dust cavity. We use high-resolution ALMA observations of 30 mas resolution in Band 6 continuum and $^{12}$CO 2--1 emission of 10 transition disk candidates in the Lupus star forming region, in order to confirm the presence of inner dust cavities and infer the responsible mechanism. The continuum data are analyzed using visibility modeling and the SEDs are compared with radiative transfer models. Out of the six transition disk candidates selected from their SED, only one disk revealed an inner dust cavity of 4 au in radius. Three of the other disks are highly inclined, which limits the detectability of an inner dust cavity but it is also demonstrated to be the possible cause for the infrared deficit in their SED. The two remaining SED-selected disks are very compact, with dust radii of only $\sim$3 au. From the four candidates selected from low-resolution images, three new transition disks with large inner cavities $>$20 au are identified, bringing the total number of transition disks with large cavities in Lupus to 13. SED-selected transition disks with small cavities are biased towards highly inclined and compact disks, which casts doubt on the use of their occurrence rates in estimating dispersal timescales of photoevaporation. Using newly derived disk dust masses and radii, we re-evaluate the size-luminosity and $M_{\rm dust}-M_{\rm star}$ relations. These relations can be understood if the bright disks are dominated by disks with substructure whereas faint disks are dominated by drift-dominated disks. (Abridged)

preprint2022arXivOpen access
0citations
0reviews
0saves
Nocode
Nodataset
0institutions

Next steps

Decide what to do with this paper

Use like or dislike for the fast social read. The more specific scholarly feedback stays available below when needed.

Log in to curate

Reading frame

Keep the important context close to the paper

Keep the important signals around this paper in one place: votes, save state, collection context, reviews and the metadata you need before deciding what to do next.

Add specific reaction

Move through the context

Research map

Open full explorer

Move through nearby people, institutions, topics and adjacent work without leaving the paper page.

Building this graph slice

BZPEER is loading the nearby papers, people, topics and institutions for this page.

Structured reviews

0 review(s)

ContributeLeave structured feedbackUse the review template when you have a concrete strength, concern or method question.Open review form

No structured reviews yet. High-signal critique starts here.

Work discussion

0 comment(s)

DiscussAdd a high-signal commentKeep quick notes, caveats and replication pointers separate from formal reviews.Open comment form

No discussion yet. The first strong comment sets the tone.