Paper detail

High-redshift star formation rate up to z~8.3 derived from gamma-ray bursts and influence of background cosmology

The high-redshift star formation rate (SFR) is difficult to measure directly even by modern approaches. Long-duration gamma-ray bursts (GRBs) can be detected to the edge of the visible universe because of their high luminorsities. The collapsar model of long gamma-ray bursts indicates that they may trace the star formation history. So long gamma-ray bursts may be a useful tool of measuring the high-redshift SFR. Observations show that long gamma-ray bursts prefer to form in a low-metallicity environment. We study the high-redshift SFR up to z~8.3 considering the Swift GRBs tracing the star formation history and the cosmic metallicity evolution in different background cosmological models including $Λ$CDM, quintessence, quintessence with a time-varying equation of state, and brane-world model. We use latest Swift GRBs including two highest-$z$ GRBs, GRB 080913 at $z=6.7$ and GRB 090423 at $z=8.3$. We find that the SFR at $z>4$ shows a steep decay with a slope of $\sim -5.0$ in $Λ$CDM. In the other three models, the high-redshift SFR is slightly different from $Λ$CDM model, and also shows a steep decay.

preprint2010arXivOpen access

Signal facts

What is known right now

Open access2 authors2 topics

Next steps

Decide what to do with this paper

Use like or dislike for the fast social read. The more specific scholarly feedback stays available below when needed.

Log in to curate

Reading frame

Keep the important context close to the paper

Keep the important signals around this paper in one place: votes, save state, collection context, reviews and the metadata you need before deciding what to do next.

Institutions

Add specific reaction

Move through the context

Research map

Open full explorer

Move through nearby people, institutions, topics and adjacent work without leaving the paper page.

Building this map preview

BZPEER is loading the nearby papers, people, topics and institutions for this page.

Structured reviews

0 review(s)

ContributeLeave structured feedbackUse the review template when you have a concrete strength, concern or method question.Open review form

No structured reviews yet. High-signal critique starts here.

Work discussion

0 comment(s)

DiscussAdd a high-signal commentKeep quick notes, caveats and replication pointers separate from formal reviews.Open comment form

No discussion yet. The first strong comment sets the tone.