Paper detail

High-redshift radio galaxies and quasars at sub-millimetre wavelengths: assessing their evolutionary status

We present new results of a study of the sub-millimetre continuum emission from a sample of 9 radio galaxies and 4 radio-quiet quasars at redshifts $z = 0.75 - 4.26$. The observations were made at 800$μm$, using the single-element bolometer UKT14 on the James Clerk Maxwell Telescope (JCMT), reaching a typical r.m.s. sensitivity of $σ_{rms} \sim 4$ mJy and represent some of the deepest submillimetre extragalactic measurements made to date. Three detections were achieved, of which two are secure (4C41.17, Dunlop et al. (1994) and H1413$+$117) and one (53W002) is tentative, whilst comparable upper-limits were obtained for 7 of the 10 remaining sources. We use these data as the motivation for a detailed discussion of the conversion from submillimetre and millimetre continuum fluxes to dust/gas masses and star formation rates at high-redshift, and determine these quantities from our own and other data on high-redshift radio-galaxies and quasars. In particular we have investigated the impact of the four main sources of uncertainty in deriving physical quantities from such data, namely i) potential contamination by galactic cirrus, ii) uncertainty in the value of the dust rest-frequency mass-absorption coefficient, iii) difficulty in constraining the dust temperature, and iv) estimation of the appropriate gas:dust ratio in high-redshift objects. Our discussion emphasises how important it will be to quantify and, where possible, minimize such uncertainties (via, for example, appropriate observational strategies) in order to fully capitalize on the ten-fold improvement in sensitivity offered by the imminent arrival of the next generation of bolometer arrays, such as SCUBA on the JCMT.

preprint1997arXivOpen access

Signal facts

What is known right now

Open access3 authors1 topic

Next steps

Decide what to do with this paper

Use like or dislike for the fast social read. The more specific scholarly feedback stays available below when needed.

Log in to curate

Reading frame

Keep the important context close to the paper

Keep the important signals around this paper in one place: votes, save state, collection context, reviews and the metadata you need before deciding what to do next.

Institutions

Add specific reaction

Move through the context

Research map

Open full explorer

Move through nearby people, institutions, topics and adjacent work without leaving the paper page.

Building this map preview

BZPEER is loading the nearby papers, people, topics and institutions for this page.

Structured reviews

0 review(s)

ContributeLeave structured feedbackUse the review template when you have a concrete strength, concern or method question.Open review form

No structured reviews yet. High-signal critique starts here.

Work discussion

0 comment(s)

DiscussAdd a high-signal commentKeep quick notes, caveats and replication pointers separate from formal reviews.Open comment form

No discussion yet. The first strong comment sets the tone.