Paper detail

High Quality Axion in Supersymmetric Models

In this work, we discuss how the use of the symmetries well motivated in physics beyond the Standard model (BSM) can guarantee the high quality axions. We avoid to introduce symmetries only useful for addressing the axion quality problem. Rather, we rely on symmetries well motivated by other issues in BSM: supersymmetry, $U(1)_{\rm B-L}$ and the discrete R-symmetry $Z_{NR}$. We show that the interplay among these guarantees the high quality of the axion even for the gravitino mass and axion decay constant as large as $m_{3/2}=\mathcal{O}(10){\rm TeV}$ and $F_{a}=\mathcal{O}(10^{15}){\rm GeV}$ respectively. The key point of this work relies on the observation that the MSSM contribution to the mixed anomalies $Z_{NR}-[SU(2)_{L}]^{2}$ and $Z_{NR}-[SU(3)_{c}]^{2}$ is not enough for gauging $Z_{NR}$ for $N\neq6$, which necessitates the introduction of new matter fields. We make the introduction to achieve zero mixed anomalies, which logically supports a desired large enough $N$ for $Z_{NR}$. This mechanism effectively makes $Z_{NR}$ equal to $U(1)_{R}$ and thus offers a logically complete solution to the axion quality problem.

preprint2022arXivOpen access
0citations
0reviews
0saves
Nocode
Nodataset
0institutions

Next steps

Decide what to do with this paper

Use like or dislike for the fast social read. The more specific scholarly feedback stays available below when needed.

Log in to curate

Reading frame

Keep the important context close to the paper

Keep the important signals around this paper in one place: votes, save state, collection context, reviews and the metadata you need before deciding what to do next.

Institutions

Add specific reaction

Move through the context

Research map

Open full explorer

Move through nearby people, institutions, topics and adjacent work without leaving the paper page.

Building this graph slice

BZPEER is loading the nearby papers, people, topics and institutions for this page.

Structured reviews

0 review(s)

ContributeLeave structured feedbackUse the review template when you have a concrete strength, concern or method question.Open review form

No structured reviews yet. High-signal critique starts here.

Work discussion

0 comment(s)

DiscussAdd a high-signal commentKeep quick notes, caveats and replication pointers separate from formal reviews.Open comment form

No discussion yet. The first strong comment sets the tone.