Paper detail

High-Precision Dark Halo Virial Masses from Globular Cluster Numbers: Implications for Globular Cluster Formation and Galaxy Assembly

We confirm that the number of globular clusters (GCs), N$_{GC}$, is an excellent tracer of their host galaxy's halo virial mass M$_{vir}$. The simple linear relation M$_{vir} = 5 \times 10^9$ M$_{\odot} \times$ N$_{GC}$ fits the data perfectly from M$_{vir} = 10^{10}$ M$_{\odot}$ to M$_{vir} = 2 \times 10^{15}$ M$_{\odot}$. This result is independent of galaxy morphology and extends statistically into the dwarf galaxy regime with M$_{vir} = 10^8 - 10^{10}$ M$_{\odot}$, including the extreme ultra diffuse galaxy DF44. As this correlation does not depend on GC mass it is ideally suited for high-precision determinations of M$_{vir}$. The linearity is most simply explained by cosmological merging of a high-redshift halo seed population that hosted on average one GC per $5 \times 10^8$ M$_{\odot}$ of dark matter. We show that hierarchical merging is also extremely powerful in restoring a linear correlation and erasing signatures of even a strong secular evolution of GC systems. The cosmological merging scenario also implies a strong decline of the scatter in $N_{GC}$ with increasing virial mass $δN_{GC}/N_{GC} \sim M_{vir}^{-1/2}$ in contrast with the observations that show a roughly constant scatter, independent of virial mass. This discrepancy can be explained if errors in determining virial masses from kinematical tracers and gravitational lensing are on the order of a factor of 2. GCs in dwarf satellite galaxies pose a serious problem for high-redshift GC formation scenarios; the dark halo masses of dwarf galaxies hosting GCs therefore might need to be an order of magnitude larger than currently estimated.

preprint2019arXivOpen access
0citations
0reviews
0saves
Nocode
Nodataset
0institutions

Next steps

Decide what to do with this paper

Use like or dislike for the fast social read. The more specific scholarly feedback stays available below when needed.

Log in to curate

Reading frame

Keep the important context close to the paper

Keep the important signals around this paper in one place: votes, save state, collection context, reviews and the metadata you need before deciding what to do next.

Institutions

Add specific reaction

Move through the context

Research map

Open full explorer

Move through nearby people, institutions, topics and adjacent work without leaving the paper page.

Building this graph slice

BZPEER is loading the nearby papers, people, topics and institutions for this page.

Structured reviews

0 review(s)

ContributeLeave structured feedbackUse the review template when you have a concrete strength, concern or method question.Open review form

No structured reviews yet. High-signal critique starts here.

Work discussion

0 comment(s)

DiscussAdd a high-signal commentKeep quick notes, caveats and replication pointers separate from formal reviews.Open comment form

No discussion yet. The first strong comment sets the tone.