High-Precision Dark Halo Virial Masses from Globular Cluster Numbers: Implications for Globular Cluster Formation and Galaxy Assembly

preprint2019arXivOpen access

Abstract

We confirm that the number of globular clusters (GCs), NGC_{GC}, is an excellent tracer of their host galaxy's halo virial mass Mvir_{vir}. The simple linear relation Mvir=5×109_{vir} = 5 \times 10^9 M⊙×_{\odot} \times NGC_{GC} fits the data perfectly from Mvir=1010_{vir} = 10^{10} M⊙_{\odot} to Mvir=2×1015_{vir} = 2 \times 10^{15} M⊙_{\odot}. This result is independent of galaxy morphology and extends statistically into the dwarf galaxy regime with Mvir=108−1010_{vir} = 10^8 - 10^{10} M⊙_{\odot}, including the extreme ultra diffuse galaxy DF44. As this correlation does not depend on GC mass it is ideally suited for high-precision determinations of Mvir_{vir}. The linearity is most simply explained by cosmological merging of a high-redshift halo seed population that hosted on average one GC per 5×1085 \times 10^8 M⊙_{\odot} of dark matter. We show that hierarchical merging is also extremely powerful in restoring a linear correlation and erasing signatures of even a strong secular evolution of GC systems. The cosmological merging scenario also implies a strong decline of the scatter in NGCN_{GC} with increasing virial mass δNGC/NGC∼Mvir−1/2δN_{GC}/N_{GC} \sim M_{vir}^{-1/2} in contrast with the observations that show a roughly constant scatter, independent of virial mass. This discrepancy can be explained if errors in determining virial masses from kinematical tracers and gravitational lensing are on the order of a factor of 2. GCs in dwarf satellite galaxies pose a serious problem for high-redshift GC formation scenarios; the dark halo masses of dwarf galaxies hosting GCs therefore might need to be an order of magnitude larger than currently estimated.

Explore this paper’s authors, topics and related work.

Building this map preview

BZPEER is loading the nearby papers, people, topics and institutions for this page.

Reviews 0

Write a reviewWrite

No reviews yet.

Discussion 0

Add a commentWrite

No comments yet.