Paper detail

High-order galaxy correlation functions in the APM Galaxy Survey

We estimate J-point galaxy averaged correlation functions $\wbar_J(θ)$ for $J=2,...,9$, in a sample of the APM Galaxy Survey with more than $1.3 \times 10^6$ galaxies and a depth $ \calD \sim 400 \Mpc$. The hierarchical amplitudes $s_J=\wbar_J/\wbar_2^{J-1}$ are roughly constant, up to $J=9$, between $0.5 \Mpc$ and $2 \Mpc$ and decrease slowly for larger scales. At scales larger than $7 \Mpc$ we find strong similarities between the statistical properties of the galaxy fluctuations and the theoretical properties of matter fluctuations evolving under the influence of gravity in an expanding universe on assumption that the initial fluctuations are small and Gaussian. This is most easily explained if at large scales there is no significant biasing between matter and galaxy fluctuations. The comparison of the skewness in the CfA and SSRS catalogues with comparable sub-samples of the APM indicates that the volume of a ``fair sample'' has to be much larger that the one in the combined CfA/SSRS catalogues.

preprint1994arXivOpen access

Signal facts

What is known right now

Open access1 author1 topic

Next steps

Decide what to do with this paper

Use like or dislike for the fast social read. The more specific scholarly feedback stays available below when needed.

Log in to curate

Reading frame

Keep the important context close to the paper

Keep the important signals around this paper in one place: votes, save state, collection context, reviews and the metadata you need before deciding what to do next.

Institutions

Add specific reaction

Move through the context

Research map

Open full explorer

Move through nearby people, institutions, topics and adjacent work without leaving the paper page.

Building this map preview

BZPEER is loading the nearby papers, people, topics and institutions for this page.

Structured reviews

0 review(s)

ContributeLeave structured feedbackUse the review template when you have a concrete strength, concern or method question.Open review form

No structured reviews yet. High-signal critique starts here.

Work discussion

0 comment(s)

DiscussAdd a high-signal commentKeep quick notes, caveats and replication pointers separate from formal reviews.Open comment form

No discussion yet. The first strong comment sets the tone.