Paper detail

High order ADER schemes and GLM curl cleaning for a first order hyperbolic formulation of compressible flow with surface tension

In this work, we introduce two novel reformulations of a recent weakly hyperbolic model for two-phase flow with surface tension. In the model, the tracking of phase boundaries is achieved by using a vector interface field, rather than a scalar tracer, so that the surface-force stress tensor can be expressed as an algebraic function of the state variables, without requiring the computation of gradients of the tracer. An interesting and important feature of the model is that this interface field obeys a curl involution constraint, that is, the vector field is required to be curl-free at all times. The proposed modifications are intended to restore the strong hyperbolicity of the model, and are closely related to divergence-preserving numerical approaches developed in the field of numerical magnetohydrodynamics (MHD). The first strategy is based on the theory of Symmetric Hyperbolic and Thermodynamically Compatible (SHTC) systems forwarded by Godunov in the 60s and 70s and yields a modified system of governing equations which includes some symmetrisation terms, in analogy to the approach adopted later by Powell et al for the ideal MHD equations. The second technique is an extension of the hyperbolic Generalized Lagrangian Multiplier (GLM) divergence cleaning approach, forwarded by Munz et al in applications to the Maxwell and MHD equations. We solve the resulting nonconservative hyperbolic PDE systems with high order ADER Discontinuous Galerkin (DG) methods with a posteriori Finite Volume subcell limiting and carry out a set of numerical tests concerning flows dominated by surface tension as well as shock-driven flows. We also provide a new exact solution to the equations, show convergence of the schemes for orders of accuracy up to ten in space and time, and investigate the role of hyperbolicity and of curl constraints in the long-term stability of the computations.

preprint2020arXivOpen access
0citations
0reviews
0saves
Nocode
Nodataset
0institutions

Next steps

Decide what to do with this paper

Use like or dislike for the fast social read. The more specific scholarly feedback stays available below when needed.

Log in to curate

Reading frame

Keep the important context close to the paper

Keep the important signals around this paper in one place: votes, save state, collection context, reviews and the metadata you need before deciding what to do next.

Institutions

Add specific reaction

Move through the context

Research map

Open full explorer

Move through nearby people, institutions, topics and adjacent work without leaving the paper page.

Building this graph slice

BZPEER is loading the nearby papers, people, topics and institutions for this page.

Structured reviews

0 review(s)

ContributeLeave structured feedbackUse the review template when you have a concrete strength, concern or method question.Open review form

No structured reviews yet. High-signal critique starts here.

Work discussion

0 comment(s)

DiscussAdd a high-signal commentKeep quick notes, caveats and replication pointers separate from formal reviews.Open comment form

No discussion yet. The first strong comment sets the tone.