Paper detail

High mass X-ray binaries as progenitors of gravitational wave sources

X-ray binaries with black hole (BH) accretors and massive star donors at short orbital periods of a few days can evolve into close binary BH systems (BBH) that merge within the Hubble time through stable mass transfer evolution. From observational point of view, upon the Roche-lobe overflow, such systems will most likely appear as ultra-luminous X-ray sources (ULXs). To study this connection, we compute the mass transfer phase in systems with BH accretors and massive star donors ($M > 15 \,M_\odot$) at various orbital separations and metallicities using the MESA stellar evolution code. In the case of core-hydrogen and core-helium burning donors (cases A and C of mass transfer) we find the typical duration of super-Eddington mass transfer of up to $10^6$ and $10^5 \, \rm yr$ , with rates of $10^{-6}$ and $10^{-5} \,M_\odot \, \rm yr^{-1}$ , respectively. Given that roughly $0.5$ ULXs are found per unit of star formation rate ($\,M_\odot \, \rm yr^{-1}$), and assuming that $10\%$ of all the observed ULXs form merging BBH, we estimate the rate of BBH mergers from stable mass transfer evolution to be at most $10 {\rm ~Gpc}^{-3} {\rm ~yr}^{-1}$.

preprint2018arXivOpen access

Signal facts

What is known right now

Open access2 authors1 topic

Next steps

Decide what to do with this paper

Use like or dislike for the fast social read. The more specific scholarly feedback stays available below when needed.

Log in to curate

Reading frame

Keep the important context close to the paper

Keep the important signals around this paper in one place: votes, save state, collection context, reviews and the metadata you need before deciding what to do next.

Institutions

Add specific reaction

Move through the context

Research map

Open full explorer

Move through nearby people, institutions, topics and adjacent work without leaving the paper page.

Building this map preview

BZPEER is loading the nearby papers, people, topics and institutions for this page.

Structured reviews

0 review(s)

ContributeLeave structured feedbackUse the review template when you have a concrete strength, concern or method question.Open review form

No structured reviews yet. High-signal critique starts here.

Work discussion

0 comment(s)

DiscussAdd a high-signal commentKeep quick notes, caveats and replication pointers separate from formal reviews.Open comment form

No discussion yet. The first strong comment sets the tone.