Paper detail

High Energy spectra of Seyferts and Unification schemes

The Unified Model of AGN predicts the sole difference between Seyfert 1 and Seyfert 2 nuclei is the viewing angle with respect to an obscuring structure around the nucleus. High energy photons above 20 keV are not affected by this absorption if the column is Compton thin, so their 30--100 keV spectra should be the same. However, the observed spectra at high energies appear to show a systematic difference, with Seyfert 1's having $Γ\sim $2.1 whereas Seyfert 2's are harder with $Γ\sim$ 1.9. We estimate the mass and accretion rate of Seyferts detected in these high energy samples and show that they span a wide range in $L/L_{Edd}$. Both black hole binary systems and AGN show a correlation between spectral softness and Eddington fraction, so these samples are probably heterogeneous, spanning a range of intrinsic spectral indices which are hidden in individual objects by poor signal-to-noise. However, the mean Eddington fraction for the Seyfert 1's is higher than for the Seyfert 2's, so the samples are consistent with this being the origin of the softer spectra seen in Seyfert 1's. We stress that high energy spectra alone are not necessarily a clean test of Unification schemes, but that the intrinsic nuclear properties should also change with $L/L_{Edd}$

preprint2007arXivOpen access

Signal facts

What is known right now

Open access3 authors1 topic

Next steps

Decide what to do with this paper

Use like or dislike for the fast social read. The more specific scholarly feedback stays available below when needed.

Log in to curate

Reading frame

Keep the important context close to the paper

Keep the important signals around this paper in one place: votes, save state, collection context, reviews and the metadata you need before deciding what to do next.

Institutions

Add specific reaction

Move through the context

Research map

Open full explorer

Move through nearby people, institutions, topics and adjacent work without leaving the paper page.

Building this map preview

BZPEER is loading the nearby papers, people, topics and institutions for this page.

Structured reviews

0 review(s)

ContributeLeave structured feedbackUse the review template when you have a concrete strength, concern or method question.Open review form

No structured reviews yet. High-signal critique starts here.

Work discussion

0 comment(s)

DiscussAdd a high-signal commentKeep quick notes, caveats and replication pointers separate from formal reviews.Open comment form

No discussion yet. The first strong comment sets the tone.