Paper detail

High Dust Depletion in Two Intervening Quasar Absorption Line Systems with the 2175-Å Extinction Bump at $z\sim1.4$

We present the column densities of heavy-elements and dust depletion studies in twostrong Mg~II absorption systems at $z\sim1.4$ displaying the 2175-Å dust extinction feature. Column densities are measured from low-ionization absorption lines using Apparent Optical Depth Method on the Keck/ESI spectra. We find the dust depletion patterns resemble to that of cold diffuse clouds in the Milky Way (MW). The values, [Fe/Zn]$\approx -1.5$ and [Si/Zn]$<-0.67$, are among the highest dust depletion measured for quasar absorption line systems. In another 2175-Å absorber at $z$=1.64 toward the quasar SDSS J160457.50+220300.5, Noterdaeme et al. (2009) reported a similar dust depletion measurement ([Fe/Zn]=$-1.47$ and [Si/Zn]=$-1.07$) and detected C~I and CO absorption lineson its VLT/UVES spectrum. We conclude that heavy dust depletion (i.e. a characteristic of cold dense clouds in MW) is required to produce a pronounced 2175-Å extinction bump.

preprint2010arXivOpen access

Signal facts

What is known right now

Open access6 authors2 topics

Next steps

Decide what to do with this paper

Use like or dislike for the fast social read. The more specific scholarly feedback stays available below when needed.

Log in to curate

Reading frame

Keep the important context close to the paper

Keep the important signals around this paper in one place: votes, save state, collection context, reviews and the metadata you need before deciding what to do next.

Institutions

Add specific reaction

Move through the context

Research map

Open full explorer

Move through nearby people, institutions, topics and adjacent work without leaving the paper page.

Building this map preview

BZPEER is loading the nearby papers, people, topics and institutions for this page.

Structured reviews

0 review(s)

ContributeLeave structured feedbackUse the review template when you have a concrete strength, concern or method question.Open review form

No structured reviews yet. High-signal critique starts here.

Work discussion

0 comment(s)

DiscussAdd a high-signal commentKeep quick notes, caveats and replication pointers separate from formal reviews.Open comment form

No discussion yet. The first strong comment sets the tone.