Paper detail

Higgs-$R^2$ inflation -- full slow-roll study at tree-level

We consider Higgs inflation with an $αR^2$ term. It adds a new scalar degree of freedom, which leads to a two-field model of inflation. We do a complete slow-roll analysis of the three-dimensional parameter space of the $R^2$ coefficient $α$, the non-minimal coupling $ξ$ and the Higgs self-coupling $λ$. We find three classes of inflationary solutions, but only pure $R^2$ and attractor solutions fit observations. We find that pure Higgs inflation is impossible when the $R^2$ term is present regardless of how small $α$ is. However, we can have Higgs-like inflation, where the amplitude of the perturbations does not depend on $α$ and the predictions as a function of e-folds are the same as in Higgs inflation, although the inflationary trajectory is curved in field space. The spectral index is $0.939 < n_R < 0.967$, and constraining it to the observed range, the tensor-to-scalar ratio varies from $3.8\times10^{-3}$ to the maximum allowed by observations, $0.079$. Observational constraints on isocurvature perturbations contribute to these limits, whereas non-Gaussianity is automatically in the range allowed by observations.

preprint2020arXivOpen access
0citations
0reviews
0saves
Nocode
Nodataset
0institutions

Next steps

Decide what to do with this paper

Use like or dislike for the fast social read. The more specific scholarly feedback stays available below when needed.

Log in to curate

Reading frame

Keep the important context close to the paper

Keep the important signals around this paper in one place: votes, save state, collection context, reviews and the metadata you need before deciding what to do next.

Institutions

Add specific reaction

Move through the context

Research map

Open full explorer

Move through nearby people, institutions, topics and adjacent work without leaving the paper page.

Building this graph slice

BZPEER is loading the nearby papers, people, topics and institutions for this page.

Structured reviews

0 review(s)

ContributeLeave structured feedbackUse the review template when you have a concrete strength, concern or method question.Open review form

No structured reviews yet. High-signal critique starts here.

Work discussion

0 comment(s)

DiscussAdd a high-signal commentKeep quick notes, caveats and replication pointers separate from formal reviews.Open comment form

No discussion yet. The first strong comment sets the tone.