Paper detail

Higgs Mass Bounds in the Three- and Six-Higgs Doublet Models for Family Structure

We reanalyze our recently proposed mass matrix model based on spontaneously broken discrete chiral family symmetry, taking into account the additional flavor changing neutral current constraint implied by the bound on the $D_1-D_2$ mass difference, and including several corrections to our earlier analysis. When combined, the $K_1-K_2$ and $D_1-D_2$ constraints force the masses of the Higgs particles that contribute most strongly to flavor changing neutral currents (the $ϕ$ Higgs states) to lie above 17 TeV, well beyond the limit of validity of conventional perturbative Higgs physics. The analogous constraints on the masses of the $η$ Higgs states and the neutral pseudo Goldstone Higgs state depend on the mechanism for realizing small first family masses. If the $η$ Higgs is the primary contributor to second family masses, the pseudo Goldstone and $η$ Higgs states must have masses above 220 GeV, with numerical fits suggesting masses above 1 TeV, while if the $η$ Higgs is responsible solely for first family masses, the corresponding mass bounds drop to the range detectable at the LHC. We show that naturalness of small first family masses favors the latter alternative, and give an illustrative mass matrix texture model.

preprint1999arXivOpen access

Signal facts

What is known right now

Open access1 author1 topic

Next steps

Decide what to do with this paper

Use like or dislike for the fast social read. The more specific scholarly feedback stays available below when needed.

Log in to curate

Reading frame

Keep the important context close to the paper

Keep the important signals around this paper in one place: votes, save state, collection context, reviews and the metadata you need before deciding what to do next.

Institutions

Add specific reaction

Move through the context

Research map

Open full explorer

Move through nearby people, institutions, topics and adjacent work without leaving the paper page.

Building this map preview

BZPEER is loading the nearby papers, people, topics and institutions for this page.

Structured reviews

0 review(s)

ContributeLeave structured feedbackUse the review template when you have a concrete strength, concern or method question.Open review form

No structured reviews yet. High-signal critique starts here.

Work discussion

0 comment(s)

DiscussAdd a high-signal commentKeep quick notes, caveats and replication pointers separate from formal reviews.Open comment form

No discussion yet. The first strong comment sets the tone.