Paper detail

Higgs Inflation in f(Φ,R) Theory

We generalize the scalar-curvature coupling model ${ξΦ^2 R}$ of Higgs inflation to $ {ξΦ^a R^b} $ to study inflation. We compute the amplitude and spectral index of curvature perturbations generated during inflation and fix the parameters of the model by comparing these with the Planck$+$WP data. We find that if the scalar self coupling $λ$ is in the range $(10^{-5}-0.1)$, parameter $a$ in the range $(2.3 -3.6)$ and $b$ in the range $(0.77-0.22)$ at the Planck scale, one can have a viable inflation model even for $ξ\simeq 1$. The tensor to scalar ratio $r$ in this model is small and our model with scalar-curvature couplings is not ruled out by observational limits on $r$ unlike the pure $\fracλ{4} Φ^4$ theory. By requiring the curvature coupling parameter to be of order unity, we have evaded the problem of unitarity violation in scalar-graviton scatterings which plague the $ξΦ^2 R$ Higgs inflation models. We conclude that the Higgs field may still be a good candidate for being the inflaton in the early universe if one considers higher dimensional curvature coupling.

preprint2014arXivOpen access

Signal facts

What is known right now

Open access3 authors3 topics

Next steps

Decide what to do with this paper

Use like or dislike for the fast social read. The more specific scholarly feedback stays available below when needed.

Log in to curate

Reading frame

Keep the important context close to the paper

Keep the important signals around this paper in one place: votes, save state, collection context, reviews and the metadata you need before deciding what to do next.

Institutions

Add specific reaction

Move through the context

Research map

Open full explorer

Move through nearby people, institutions, topics and adjacent work without leaving the paper page.

Building this map preview

BZPEER is loading the nearby papers, people, topics and institutions for this page.

Structured reviews

0 review(s)

ContributeLeave structured feedbackUse the review template when you have a concrete strength, concern or method question.Open review form

No structured reviews yet. High-signal critique starts here.

Work discussion

0 comment(s)

DiscussAdd a high-signal commentKeep quick notes, caveats and replication pointers separate from formal reviews.Open comment form

No discussion yet. The first strong comment sets the tone.