Paper detail

Higgs Effective Field Theories - Systematics and Applications

We discuss effective field theories (EFTs) for the Higgs particle, which is not necessarily the Higgs of the Standard Model. We distinguish two different consistent expansions: EFTs that describe decoupling new-physics effects and EFTs that describe non-decoupling new-physics effects. We briefly discuss the first case, the SM-EFT. The focus of this thesis is on the non-decoupling EFTs. We argue that the loop expansion is the consistent expansion in the second case. We introduce the concept of chiral dimensions, equivalent to the loop expansion. Using the chiral dimensions, we expand the electroweak chiral Lagrangian up to next-to-leading order, $\mathcal{O}(f^{2}/Λ^{2})=\mathcal{O}(1/16π^{2})$. We then compare the decoupling and the non-decoupling EFT. We also consider scenarios in which the new-physics sector is non-decoupling at a scale $f$, far above the electroweak-scale $v$. We discuss the relevance of the resulting double expansion in $ξ=v^{2}/f^{2}$ and $f^{2}/Λ^{2}$ for the data analysis at the LHC. In the second part, we discuss the applications of the EFTs, especially of the electroweak chiral Lagrangian. First, we connect the EFT with explicit models of new physics. We show how different regions of the parameter space of the same model generate a decoupling and a non-decoupling EFT. Second, we use the expansion at leading order to describe the current LHC Higgs data. We show how the current parametrization of the Higgs data, the $κ$-framework, can be justified quantum field theoretically by the EFT. We fit the data of Run-1 (2010--2013). The effective Lagrangian describing this data can be reduced to six free parameters. The result of this fit is consistent with the SM, but it has statistical uncertainties of about ten percent.

preprint2016arXivOpen access

Signal facts

What is known right now

Open access1 author1 topic

Next steps

Decide what to do with this paper

Use like or dislike for the fast social read. The more specific scholarly feedback stays available below when needed.

Log in to curate

Reading frame

Keep the important context close to the paper

Keep the important signals around this paper in one place: votes, save state, collection context, reviews and the metadata you need before deciding what to do next.

Institutions

Add specific reaction

Move through the context

Research map

Open full explorer

Move through nearby people, institutions, topics and adjacent work without leaving the paper page.

Building this map preview

BZPEER is loading the nearby papers, people, topics and institutions for this page.

Structured reviews

0 review(s)

ContributeLeave structured feedbackUse the review template when you have a concrete strength, concern or method question.Open review form

No structured reviews yet. High-signal critique starts here.

Work discussion

0 comment(s)

DiscussAdd a high-signal commentKeep quick notes, caveats and replication pointers separate from formal reviews.Open comment form

No discussion yet. The first strong comment sets the tone.