Paper detail

Higgs boson in a flavor-extension of the CMSSM

Flavour-violating couplings of Higgs boson with stop and scharm quarks could be very important as in addition to lifting the mass of the Higgs boson by a few GeV, it could also play a vital phenomenological role in reducing the Supersymmetry breaking scale significantly. In this work, we investigate effects of such flavour-violating couplings within the Constrained Minimal Supersymmetric Standard Model (CMSSM) framework in the context of LEP data, Higgs data at the LHC, precision observables and the relic density of the dark matter using Bayesian statistics. Our detailed analysis reveals that the most probable values of $m_{0}$, $m_{1/2}$, $A_{0}$, $\tanβ$, $δ^{LR}_{ct}$ are expected to be around 4.83 TeV, 2.54 TeV, 1.90 TeV, 41.5, and 6.1$\times10^{-2}$, respectively, with flat priors. The corresponding values translate into 3.25 TeV, 2.13 TeV, 1.90 TeV, 44.7, and 5.9$\times10^{-2}$, respectively, if the natural priors are used. Furthermore, a comparison of our model with the CMSSM of flavour-conservation as the base model yields a Bayes factor of about 6 while taking into account all the experimental constraints used in our study. Our analysis also reflects that the lightest neutralino would have a mass of about 1 TeV.

preprint2022arXivOpen access

Signal facts

What is known right now

Open access3 authors2 topics

Next steps

Decide what to do with this paper

Use like or dislike for the fast social read. The more specific scholarly feedback stays available below when needed.

Log in to curate

Reading frame

Keep the important context close to the paper

Keep the important signals around this paper in one place: votes, save state, collection context, reviews and the metadata you need before deciding what to do next.

Institutions

Add specific reaction

Move through the context

Research map

Open full explorer

Move through nearby people, institutions, topics and adjacent work without leaving the paper page.

Building this map preview

BZPEER is loading the nearby papers, people, topics and institutions for this page.

Structured reviews

0 review(s)

ContributeLeave structured feedbackUse the review template when you have a concrete strength, concern or method question.Open review form

No structured reviews yet. High-signal critique starts here.

Work discussion

0 comment(s)

DiscussAdd a high-signal commentKeep quick notes, caveats and replication pointers separate from formal reviews.Open comment form

No discussion yet. The first strong comment sets the tone.