Paper detail

Hierarchy and decoupling

A large hierarchy between the electroweak scale and virtually any new scale of beyond-Standard-Model physics is often claimed to be unnatural. Sometimes, the apparent disparity between the measured Higgs mass and the size of the typical loop corrections encountered within such schemes is even interpretted as a profound indication that one should expect a remedy just behind the corner, probably in form of a new physics such as low-scale supersymmetry, new strong dynamics etc. In reality, all such potentially large corrections in the one- and two-point Green's functions cancel with each other in the physical Higgs mass $m_{H}$ which eventually turns out to be driven only by the electroweak VEV $v$. This, naively, may look like a miracle, the more that the standard perturbative approach often makes it irresistible to discuss the magnitudes of those corrections as if, individually, they were physically relevant. To shed some more light on this conundrum we advocate a method based on the symmetry properties of the Coleman-Weinberg effective potential which not only makes it very clear why $m_H\propto v$ to all orders in the perturbative expansion but, at the same time, it does not require any inspection of the explicit form of the tadpole equations whatsoever. Besides simplifying the calculations considerably it makes the "internal composition" of the VEV in terms of the high-scale parameters essentially irrelevant. We exemplify these findings on an extended series of specific simplified models in which the role of the heavy dynamics is played by all "reasonable" types of fields (barring gravity), i.e., by a heavy scalar, a heavy (Majorana) fermion and a heavy vector, respectively. We show that the dependence of $m_{H}$ on the heavy scale follows the expectation based on dynamical arguments such as the decoupling theorem.

preprint2019arXivOpen access
0citations
0reviews
0saves
Nocode
Nodataset
0institutions

Next steps

Decide what to do with this paper

Use like or dislike for the fast social read. The more specific scholarly feedback stays available below when needed.

Log in to curate

Reading frame

Keep the important context close to the paper

Keep the important signals around this paper in one place: votes, save state, collection context, reviews and the metadata you need before deciding what to do next.

Institutions

Add specific reaction

Move through the context

Research map

Open full explorer

Move through nearby people, institutions, topics and adjacent work without leaving the paper page.

Building this graph slice

BZPEER is loading the nearby papers, people, topics and institutions for this page.

Structured reviews

0 review(s)

ContributeLeave structured feedbackUse the review template when you have a concrete strength, concern or method question.Open review form

No structured reviews yet. High-signal critique starts here.

Work discussion

0 comment(s)

DiscussAdd a high-signal commentKeep quick notes, caveats and replication pointers separate from formal reviews.Open comment form

No discussion yet. The first strong comment sets the tone.