Paper detail

Hierarchical modelling of faecal egg counts to assess anthelmintic efficacy

Counting the number of parasite eggs in faecal samples is a widely used diagnostic method to evaluate parasite burden. Typically a sub-sample of the diluted faeces is examined for eggs. The resulting egg counts are multiplied by a specific correction factor to estimate the mean parasite burden. To detect anthelmintic resistance, the mean parasite burden from treated and untreated animals are compared. However, this standard method has some limitations. In particular, the analysis of repeated samples may produce quite variable results as the sampling variability due to the counting technique is ignored. We propose a hierarchical model that takes this sampling variability as well as between-animal variation into account. Bayesian inference is done via Markov chain Monte Carlo sampling. The performance of the hierarchical model is illustrated by a re-analysis of faecal egg count data from a Swedish study assessing the anthelmintic resistance of nematode parasite in sheep. A simulation study shows that the hierarchical model provides better classification of anthelmintic resistance compared to the standard method.

preprint2014arXivOpen access

Signal facts

What is known right now

Open access4 authors1 topic

Next steps

Decide what to do with this paper

Use like or dislike for the fast social read. The more specific scholarly feedback stays available below when needed.

Log in to curate

Reading frame

Keep the important context close to the paper

Keep the important signals around this paper in one place: votes, save state, collection context, reviews and the metadata you need before deciding what to do next.

Institutions

Add specific reaction

Move through the context

Research map

Open full explorer

Move through nearby people, institutions, topics and adjacent work without leaving the paper page.

Building this map preview

BZPEER is loading the nearby papers, people, topics and institutions for this page.

Structured reviews

0 review(s)

ContributeLeave structured feedbackUse the review template when you have a concrete strength, concern or method question.Open review form

No structured reviews yet. High-signal critique starts here.

Work discussion

0 comment(s)

DiscussAdd a high-signal commentKeep quick notes, caveats and replication pointers separate from formal reviews.Open comment form

No discussion yet. The first strong comment sets the tone.