Paper detail

Hierarchical correlations in models of galaxy clustering

We present a comparison of the predictions of perturbation theory for the hierarchical J-order correlation amplitudes $S_J=\xibar_J/\xibar_2^{J-1}$, $J=3-10$, with the results of large numerical simulations of gravitational clustering. We consider two different initial power spectra of density fluctuations, one being flatter than the other. The clustering amplitudes $S_J$ measured in these models are different at all scales. In each case, the perturbation theory predictions give an excellent agreement with the simulations on scales for which the variance is approximately linear, i.e. for scales on which $\xibar_2 \simlt 1$. For cells of radius $R \simgt 30 \Mpc$, the sampling variance arising from the finite size of our simulations dominates the results. We also find that $S_J$ are roughly independent of time, $Ω$, or $λ$, as expected. On comparing with the observations, one can use these results to discriminate between models for structure formation.

preprint1994arXivOpen access

Signal facts

What is known right now

Open access2 authors1 topic

Next steps

Decide what to do with this paper

Use like or dislike for the fast social read. The more specific scholarly feedback stays available below when needed.

Log in to curate

Reading frame

Keep the important context close to the paper

Keep the important signals around this paper in one place: votes, save state, collection context, reviews and the metadata you need before deciding what to do next.

Institutions

Add specific reaction

Move through the context

Research map

Open full explorer

Move through nearby people, institutions, topics and adjacent work without leaving the paper page.

Building this map preview

BZPEER is loading the nearby papers, people, topics and institutions for this page.

Structured reviews

0 review(s)

ContributeLeave structured feedbackUse the review template when you have a concrete strength, concern or method question.Open review form

No structured reviews yet. High-signal critique starts here.

Work discussion

0 comment(s)

DiscussAdd a high-signal commentKeep quick notes, caveats and replication pointers separate from formal reviews.Open comment form

No discussion yet. The first strong comment sets the tone.