Paper detail

Hierarchical Clustering in Graph Streams: Single-Pass Algorithms and Space Lower Bounds

The Hierarchical Clustering (HC) problem consists of building a hierarchy of clusters to represent a given dataset. Motivated by the modern large-scale applications, we study the problem in the \streaming model, in which the memory is heavily limited and only a single or very few passes over the input are allowed. Specifically, we investigate whether a good hierarchical clustering can be obtained, or at least whether we can approximately estimate the value of the optimal hierarchy. To measure the quality of a hierarchy, we use the HC minimization objective introduced by Dasgupta. Assuming that the input is an $n$-vertex weighted graph whose edges arrive in a stream, we derive the following results on space-vs-accuracy tradeoffs: * With $O(n\cdot \text{polylog}\,{n})$ space, we develop a single-pass algorithm, whose approximation ratio matches the currently best offline algorithm. * When the space is more limited, namely, $n^{1-o(1)}$, we prove that no algorithm can even estimate the value of optimum HC tree to within an $o(\frac{\log{n}}{\log\log{n}})$ factor, even when allowed $\text{polylog}{\,{n}}$ passes over the input. * In the most stringent setting of $\text{polylog}\,{n}$ space, we rule out algorithms that can even distinguish between "highly"-vs-"poorly" clusterable graphs, namely, graphs that have an $n^{1/2-o(1)}$ factor gap between their HC objective value. * Finally, we prove that any single-pass streaming algorithm that computes an optimal HC tree requires to store almost the entire input even if allowed exponential time. Our algorithmic results establish a general structural result that proves that cut sparsifiers of input graph can preserve cost of "balanced" HC trees to within a constant factor. Our lower bound results include a new streaming lower bound for a novel problem "One-vs-Many-Expanders", which can be of independent interest.

preprint2022arXivOpen access
0citations
0reviews
0saves
Nocode
Nodataset
0institutions

Next steps

Decide what to do with this paper

Use like or dislike for the fast social read. The more specific scholarly feedback stays available below when needed.

Log in to curate

Reading frame

Keep the important context close to the paper

Keep the important signals around this paper in one place: votes, save state, collection context, reviews and the metadata you need before deciding what to do next.

Institutions

Add specific reaction

Move through the context

Research map

Open full explorer

Move through nearby people, institutions, topics and adjacent work without leaving the paper page.

Building this graph slice

BZPEER is loading the nearby papers, people, topics and institutions for this page.

Structured reviews

0 review(s)

ContributeLeave structured feedbackUse the review template when you have a concrete strength, concern or method question.Open review form

No structured reviews yet. High-signal critique starts here.

Work discussion

0 comment(s)

DiscussAdd a high-signal commentKeep quick notes, caveats and replication pointers separate from formal reviews.Open comment form

No discussion yet. The first strong comment sets the tone.