Paper detail

Hierarchical clustering in chameleon $f(R)$ gravity

We use a suite of high resolution state-of-the-art N-body Dark Matter simulations of chameleon $f(R)$ gravity to study the higher order volume averaged correlation functions $\bar{ξ_n}$ together with the hierarchical $n$-th order correlation amplitudes $S_n=\barξ_n/\barξ_2^{n-1}$ and density distribution functions (PDF). We show that under the non-linear modifications of gravity the hierarchical scaling of the reduced cumulants is preserved. This is however characterised by significant changes of both the $\bar{ξ_n}$ and $S_n$'s values and their scale dependence with respect to General Relativity gravity (GR). In addition, we measure a significant increase of the non linear $σ_8$ parameter reaching $14, 5$ and 0.5% in excess of the GR value for the three flavours of our $f(R)$ models. We further note that the values of the reduced cumulants up to order $n=9$ are significantly increased in $f(R)$ gravity for all our models at small scales $R\simlt 30\hmpc$. In contrast the values of the hierarchical amplitudes, $S_n$'s, are smaller in $f(R)$ indicating that the modified gravity density distribution functions are deviating from the GR case. Furthermore we find that the redshift evolution of relative deviations of the $f(R)$ hierarchical correlation amplitudes is fastest at high and moderate redshifts $1\leq z \leq4$. The growth of these deviations significantly slows down in the low redshift universe. We also compute the PDFs and show that for scales below $\sim 20\hmpc$ they are significantly shifted in $f(R)$ gravity towards the low densities. Finally we discuss the implications of our theoretical predictions for measurements of the hierarchical clustering in galaxy redshifts surveys, including the important problems of the galaxy biasing and redshifts space distortions.

preprint2013arXivOpen access
0citations
0reviews
0saves
Nocode
Nodataset
0institutions

Next steps

Decide what to do with this paper

Use like or dislike for the fast social read. The more specific scholarly feedback stays available below when needed.

Log in to curate

Reading frame

Keep the important context close to the paper

Keep the important signals around this paper in one place: votes, save state, collection context, reviews and the metadata you need before deciding what to do next.

Institutions

Add specific reaction

Move through the context

Research map

Open full explorer

Move through nearby people, institutions, topics and adjacent work without leaving the paper page.

Building this graph slice

BZPEER is loading the nearby papers, people, topics and institutions for this page.

Structured reviews

0 review(s)

ContributeLeave structured feedbackUse the review template when you have a concrete strength, concern or method question.Open review form

No structured reviews yet. High-signal critique starts here.

Work discussion

0 comment(s)

DiscussAdd a high-signal commentKeep quick notes, caveats and replication pointers separate from formal reviews.Open comment form

No discussion yet. The first strong comment sets the tone.