Paper detail

Hierarchical Bayesian Thermonuclear Rate for the $^7$Be(n,p)$^7$Li Big Bang Nucleosynthesis Reaction

Big bang nucleosynthesis provides the earliest probe of standard model physics, at a time when the universe was less than a thousand seconds old. It determines the abundances of the lightest nuclides, which give rise to the subsequent history of the visible matter in the Universe. This work derives new $^7$Be(n,p)$^7$Li thermonuclear reaction rates based on all available experimental information. This reaction sensitively impacts the primordial abundances of $^{7}$Be and $^7$Li during big bang nucleosynthesis. We critically evaluate all available data and disregard experimental results that are questionable. For the nuclear model, we adopt an incoherent sum of single-level, two-channel R-matrix approximation expressions, which are implemented into a hierarchical Bayesian model, to analyze the remaining six data sets we deem most reliable. In the fitting of the data, we consistently model all known sources of uncertainty, including discrepant absolute normalizations of different data sets, and also take the variation of the neutron and proton channel radii into account, hence providing less biased estimates of the $^7$Be(n,p)$^7$Li thermonuclear rates. From the resulting posteriors, we extract R-matrix parameters ($E_r$, $γ^2_n$, $γ^2_p$) and derive excitation energies, partial and total widths. Our fit is sensitive to the contributions of the first three levels above the neutron threshold. Reaction rates were computed by integrating 10,000 samples of the reduced cross section. Our $^7$Be(n,p)$^7$Li thermonuclear rates have uncertainties between 1.5% and 2.0% at temperatures of $\leq$1 GK. We compare our rates to previous results and find that the $^7$Be(n,p)$^7$Li rates most commonly used in big bang simulations have too optimistic uncertainties.

preprint2020arXivOpen access

Signal facts

What is known right now

Open access4 authors3 topics

Next steps

Decide what to do with this paper

Use like or dislike for the fast social read. The more specific scholarly feedback stays available below when needed.

Log in to curate

Reading frame

Keep the important context close to the paper

Keep the important signals around this paper in one place: votes, save state, collection context, reviews and the metadata you need before deciding what to do next.

Institutions

Add specific reaction

Move through the context

Research map

Open full explorer

Move through nearby people, institutions, topics and adjacent work without leaving the paper page.

Building this map preview

BZPEER is loading the nearby papers, people, topics and institutions for this page.

Structured reviews

0 review(s)

ContributeLeave structured feedbackUse the review template when you have a concrete strength, concern or method question.Open review form

No structured reviews yet. High-signal critique starts here.

Work discussion

0 comment(s)

DiscussAdd a high-signal commentKeep quick notes, caveats and replication pointers separate from formal reviews.Open comment form

No discussion yet. The first strong comment sets the tone.