Paper detail

Hidden biases in flux-resolved X-ray spectroscopy

Flux-resolved X-ray spectroscopy is widely adopted to investigate the spectral variation of a target between various flux levels. In many cases it is done through horizontally splitting a single light curve into multiple flux levels with certain count rate threshold(s). In this work we point out there are two hidden biases in this approach which could affect the spectral analyses under particular circumstances. The first is that, when Poisson fluctuations of the source counts in light curve bins are non-negligible compared with the intrinsic variation, this approach would over-estimate (under-estimate) the intrinsic average flux level of the high (low) state. The second bias is that, when the Poisson fluctuations of the background count rate is non-negligible, the background spectrum of the high (low) state would be under-estimated (over-estimated), thus yielding biased spectral fitting parameters. We take NuSTAR spectra for example to illustrate the effects of the biases, and particularly, how the measurements of the coronal temperature in AGNs would be biased. We present a toy method to assess the significance of such biases, and approaches to correct for them when necessary.

preprint2023arXivOpen access
0citations
0reviews
0saves
Nocode
Nodataset
0institutions

Next steps

Decide what to do with this paper

Use like or dislike for the fast social read. The more specific scholarly feedback stays available below when needed.

Log in to curate

Reading frame

Keep the important context close to the paper

Keep the important signals around this paper in one place: votes, save state, collection context, reviews and the metadata you need before deciding what to do next.

Institutions

Add specific reaction

Move through the context

Research map

Open full explorer

Move through nearby people, institutions, topics and adjacent work without leaving the paper page.

Building this graph slice

BZPEER is loading the nearby papers, people, topics and institutions for this page.

Structured reviews

0 review(s)

ContributeLeave structured feedbackUse the review template when you have a concrete strength, concern or method question.Open review form

No structured reviews yet. High-signal critique starts here.

Work discussion

0 comment(s)

DiscussAdd a high-signal commentKeep quick notes, caveats and replication pointers separate from formal reviews.Open comment form

No discussion yet. The first strong comment sets the tone.